Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
John Kerry
Related: About this forumSetting the standard for dishonest smears
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2012_01/setting_the_standard_for_disho034491.phpSetting the standard for dishonest smears
by Steve Benen
There's no great mystery as to why Newt Gingrich's support collapsed in Iowa: Mitt Romney and his friends spent nearly $4 million in three weeks to tear Gingrich apart.
But before the disgraced former House Speaker began calling Romney a "liar," he used a different word to describe his recent experiences:Gingrich said Sunday he felt "Romney-boated" by the attacks. The reference, obviously, referenced the loathsome Swift Boat ads run and financed by Bush/Cheney allies in 2004, casting doubts on John Kerry's heroic military service.
It was a fascinating choice of words for Gingrich. As Eric Boehlert explained this morning, "Newt Gingrich, a leader of the modern-day conservative movement, presidential candidate, and proud Republican partisan adopting language that acknowledged the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth are synonymous with unsubstantiated campaign attack ads. With his 'Romney-boated' comment, the former Republican Speaker of the House reinforced what progressives have been saying for years."
Quite right. And as it turns out, some of the Swift Boat liars aren't happy about it.
John O'Neill, the swift-boat captain who led the anti-Kerry movement, is none too pleased with the comparison. "To me, it reflects Gingrich's very cynical hypocrisy, which he shares with Kerry," O'Neill tells National Review Online.
O'Neill proceeded to elaborate on his disdain for Gingrich, but the larger point is unavoidable: the Swift Boat liars lied about a war hero, they got caught, and their legacy is a standard for vicious campaign smears.
O'Neill may not like the comparison, but when the attack fits....
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2064 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Setting the standard for dishonest smears (Original Post)
Mass
Jan 2012
OP
Inuca
(8,945 posts)1. I found Gingrich's comment offensive
but did not think of it from this interesting perspective.
karynnj
(59,935 posts)2. I LOVE this article! Thanks for posting it
I wonder if O'Neill realizes yet that no matter what else he has done or will do with his life he will be seen as the man Nixon found to challenge a much better man - in all ways - than he was. That he continued that effort through lies nearly 40 years later shows the ugly person that he is.
wisteria
(19,581 posts)3. Well said! n/t
beachmom
(15,239 posts)4. I think Gingrich's comments from today, when he essentially criticized Bush's '04 campaign
show that Gingrich really was talking about how Kerry was treated. Not a metaphor, but it actually being a smear campaign. Obviously, I don't like Gingrich (especially being here in GA), but I think he is acknowledging what a lot of GOPers have said privately -- that the SBVT went over the line.
madinmaryland
(65,154 posts)5. Fuck you, O'Neill. You are a fucking liar.