Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumConcern troll pretends to support but uses "concern" to hurt morale (HRC GP)
In an argument (usually a political debate), a concern troll is someone who is on one side of the discussion, but pretends to be a supporter of the other side with "concerns". The idea behind this is that your opponents will take your arguments more seriously if they think you're an ally.
A concern troll will pretend to care (about the opponent's health, well being, political activism, lifestyle, choices, etc.) while in reality, he or she only wants to cause self doubt and fear. A concern troll tries to undermine that which he or she pretends to support.
http://concerntroll.tumblr.com/
?
Urban Dictionary defines a concern troll as "someone who is on one side of the discussion, but pretends to be a supporter of the other side with 'concerns.'" In other words, it's someone who pretends to support you but couches their disagreements in the form of "concerns," which allows them to justify criticism as the result of worrying about you. "I'm on your side," they say, "but you shouldn't do X, Y, and Z. It looks bad to some people not that I agree, but I thought you should know."
http://www.bustle.com/articles/144447-what-is-concern-trolling-watch-out-for-this-subtle-form-of-shaming
A concern troll is a false flag pseudonym created by a user whose actual point of view is opposed to the one that the user's sockpuppet claims to hold. The concern troll posts in web forums devoted to its declared point of view and attempts to sway the group's actions or opinions while claiming to share their goals, but with professed "concerns". The goal is to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt within the group.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/11/1/632558/-
concern troll
A person who posts on a blog thread, in the guise of "concern," to disrupt dialogue or undermine morale by pointing out that posters and/or the site may be getting themselves in trouble, usually with an authority or power. They point out problems that don't really exist. The intent is to derail, stifle, control, the dialogue. It is viewed as insincere and condescending.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=concern%20troll
Enter the Concern Troll
But I think it touches on a larger trend in opinionating.
Enter The Concern Troll.
There are two ways of disagreeing with someone. One is to disagree openly. The other is to say, I support you, but youre doing it wrong.
The second is insidious.
The second is condescending, insincere, manipulative. It even says so in the Urban Dictionary definition.
The darkest moment is always just after the concern trolls start pouring in.
Im with you, the concern troll says. But surely you must see how this looks to people. Not me, of course. But other people. They might think horrible things of you. People might think you were self-centered, fat, slow, rude. Not me, of course. Im with you. I have your best interests at heart. Thats why I want to warn you. I, you see, know how this ought to be done.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2014/01/13/enter-the-concern-troll/
In the blog world we call this concern trolling offering a poisoned apple in the form of advice to political opponents that, if taken, would harm the recipient.
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/markos-moulitas/24407-dems-ignore-concern-trolls
Here from Geek Feminism Wiki but we can apply to any topic/group !
A concern troll is a person who participates in a debate posing as an actual or potential ally who simply has some concerns they need answered before they will ally themselves with a cause. In reality they are a critic. Concern trolling in geek feminism communities can result in continual reversion to Feminism 101 discussions in attempts to appease the troll's concerns, frustrating attempts at more serious discussion. Concern trolls are not always self-aware; they may also view themselves as potential allies who have just, oddly, never met a feminist opinion they liked.
Concern trolls can be identified primarily because they will retreat from, rather than engage with or be convinced by, answers to the questions they pose. They may repeatedly ask a certain question in feminist discussions without ever absorbing or replying to answers from previous discussions. They will often back into typical anti-feminist arguments, such as expressing concern that an argument is too "extreme" or a feminist too "strident" or even "hysterical". Another common tactic is insisting that some subjects are more important than others, for example, that media depictions of women shouldn't be criticised while violence against women continues.
http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Concern_troll
How do you respond?
?
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)Last edited Sat Jul 2, 2016, 08:19 AM - Edit history (1)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512231874and:
Concern troll pretends to support but uses "concern" to hurt morale (GD)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027973729
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)Artful concern trolling involves developing a believable persona as a supporter of a cause who has legitimate concerns. In an example of concern trolling, a group of people might be having a political discussion on a website about a candidate they support. The concern troll would log on and say I'm concerned that this candidate might not be strong enough to beat the opposition, or I'm worried that the candidate's history in the legislature might be a problem in the election.
Once a concern troll has sowed dissent or discord, often he or she can sit back and let the other commenters do the rest of the work. When a concern troll has done the job correctly, the discussion will split, factions will emerge, and support for the cause will have eroded. Concern trolling can also be highly distracting, as people band together to oppose the concern troll, rather than discussing serious issues, including valid concerns which should be addressed
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-concern-trolling.htm
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Her Sister
(6,444 posts)So concerned!
NYC Liberal
(20,347 posts)Her Sister
(6,444 posts)Love how people always always give themselves away! They do it sooner than later, and they don't realize that they do.
People give themselves away by what they choose and by what they don't choose to say or do!
DemonGoddess
(5,123 posts)There sure is a ton of it in GD 2016 isn't there?
treestar
(82,383 posts)"Thanks for your concern."
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)mcar
(43,504 posts)Her Sister
(6,444 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)But they are keeping my Ignore button busy, that's for sure.
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)The first one I encountered on campus claimed to support McGovern, but just had serious concerns about his party platform, and he just didn't know if he could bring himself to vote for him. Interesting things about this guy: he was always around the TCU campus, but no one ever seemed to know him or see him in classes. And there were only 7000 students at that that time...kind of hard to blend in. He disappeared sometime between the party convention and the election, but I've always wondered how many ratf@&kers like him were trolling other schools.
The concerns about the platform are not new, by any means. The platform is one of the easiest targets in a national election cycle.
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)Think that guy was patient zero ? Geeeeeesh!!!!
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)Between the concern trolls and the FBI buzzcut hairdos copying down license plate numbers at peace rallies, my undergrad years were never boring. But let's not talk about the streaking, OK?