Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumHow long did you pause
before agreeing to the new posting terms?
Me... about a second.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)Arkansas Granny
(31,811 posts)Fla Dem
(25,639 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Different. Looking forward to great post.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)question everything
(48,736 posts)to find the announcement and that I had to sign that I agreed...
When I first logged in I was asked to serve on a jury and this is entirely different format which I am not sure..
I've always added an explanation to my decision so I will be missing it.
It only goes from cold to warm..
BootinUp
(48,918 posts)you have to agree to the new rules/terms whatever you want to call them. I was just curious if people took time to read it all, or already understood it and clicked right through.
question everything
(48,736 posts)Maru Kitteh
(29,048 posts)I'm glad to see the changes.
sheshe2
(87,272 posts)Already been on jury as well.
MineralMan
(147,445 posts)I had already read the new rules. When I returned to the GD:2016 thread list, I was immediately called for a jury.
I like it that we no longer know who posted what is being juried, nor do we see the results. It seems more fair that way.
radical noodle
(8,477 posts)Hekate
(94,488 posts)sarae
(3,284 posts)It sounds very reasonable to me.
How nice will it be to have civil discussions without verbal abuse and hostility?
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)There were a couple of points I mildly disagree with, but I didn't expect to agree with everything. Overall, a VERY positive change.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)I was very happy to see that Skinner was fair. No Clinton OR Sanders bashing.
wysi
(1,514 posts)Maybe I should have.