Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumWho needs enemies when have you people like this
Sorry to subject you to rambling of a lunatic but debbie aka known as the "sane" progressive is saying that California was rigged (of course) and election fraud, saying that Sander supporters had to vote on provisional ballets even though if you don't register as a Democrat, yeah your going to vote on provisional and of course she is saying voting machines automatically switched for Hillary also no proof.
And my favorite, exit polls is suppose to equal actual results in her mind.
DemonGoddess
(5,108 posts)that the networks aren't even doing them anymore
Ellen Forradalom
(16,178 posts)and posted nasty memes about 'oppression in a pantsuit'. Blocked her.
Cha
(305,136 posts)No "election fraud" in Montana or ND, though.. right?
still_one
(96,436 posts)All votes are counted in California, including provisional ballots.
Q: Are vote-by-mail and provisional ballots always counted even in "landslide" elections?
A: Yes, every valid ballot returned to county elections officials by 8:00 p.m. on election day is counted in every election, regardless of the ballot type or the margin in any particular contest.
http://www.sos.ca.gov/administration/news-releases-and-advisories/2014-news-releases-and-advisories/db14-090/
http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting-resources/provisional-voting/
http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-status/
They believe any BS that they read on social media, in study of actually getting the facts
Legends303
(481 posts)got thrown under the bus, called Warren a sellout and Obama a corporatist on twitter. The butthurt keeps getting better.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)calling him a "corporatist" since forever. They use that term so much that it has lost all meaning.
msongs
(70,123 posts)complain jane
(4,302 posts)You seem very interested in posting negativity.
Legends303
(481 posts)but once the GE officially starts I wouldn't even mention Sanders anymore and focus on Trump and ignore most these people.
BainsBane
(54,728 posts)I don't care for her.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)Legends303
(481 posts)man if that was true Hillary owes me a lot of money for campaigning for her over the internet.
George II
(67,782 posts)TwilightZone
(28,833 posts)expected Sanders to do well. Self-selected data.
DLCWIdem
(1,580 posts)Clinton won early vote 2 to 1. We also knew that mail in votes were going to be going for 2 days and that all ma il in votes which were postmarked by election day would be counted. What b.s. supporters seem to think is that all those votes are Bernie's. They are like well there is (insert amount) votes to count; they must all Bernie votes (even when they are coming from her areas). And what would you like to bet that those votes they are complaining about were postmarked after election day.
TwilightZone
(28,833 posts)any sense. But then, a lot of the bandwagon jumping they did never made sense. They latch on to any wild theory, regardless of how wacky and false it is, as long as it gives them hope.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)That's what you get when you don't pay attention to politics, rules, and want to keep your "independence".
I blame Sanders for this misinformation. He made it appear as if the Democratic Party primaries are exactly like the G.E. where everybody and his uncle can vote in every Democratic Party primary election to choose the Party's nominee. That's not how it works at all, and he should've told them. Were that the case, Republicans or Libertarians would be able to openly rat-breed with the process, choosing the Democratic Party's nominee for us - which, in their best interest, would be the weakest candidate who's easiest to beat.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)She can't really be this insane, can she?