Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumWashPo: California’s most Latino congressional districts broke for Clinton (HRC GP)
Great to know! Will post excerpts in a moment!
It was a familiar sight for any reporter covering Bernie Sanders on his final California swings: young Latino voters, crowding into rallies and cheering him on. While the Vermont senator's struggle with non-white voters defined his campaign, and limited the reach of his insurgency, starting in Nevada he seemed to have more success with second-generation Latinos. They weren't tied to their parents' politics; they were receptive to the idea that the Obama administration, of which Hillary Clinton was part, had carried out a heartless deportation policy. In polls before the June 7 primary, Sanders had fought to a tie with Latino voters.
Those polls, on average, missed an easy Clinton rout in California and they seem to have missed her resilience with Latino voters. Clinton won all 12 of the California congressional districts where Latino voters make up supermajorities of the population. (Sanders appears to have won just two districts, the largely white and rural 1st and 2nd districts of northern California.) Both Clinton and Sanders campaigned in the state's most heavily Latino seat, the 40th, which covers east Los Angeles. There, 86.6 percent of the population is Latino, and 55.4 percent of voters broke for Clinton.
It was a similar story across the state, though Sanders's vote was stronger where voters skewed younger. Clinton did worst just 51.5 percent of the vote in the 34th district, which is 66.5 percent Latino and covers downtown Los Angeles. She did only slightly better (52.0 percent) in Orange County's 46th district, one of the parts of the state that swung from Republican to safely Democratic as younger Latinos moved in.
The rest of the picture is below. In all of these districts, save CA-29, Clinton ran ahead of her statewide margin.
CA-16 (Central Valley): 58.1 percent Latino, 58.7 percent for Clinton.
CA-21 (Central Valley): 72.1 percent Latino, 62.7 percent for Clinton.
CA-29 (San Fernando Valley): 67.7 percent Latino, 53.7 percent for Clinton.
CA-32 (East LA sprawl): 61.9 percent Latino, 58.0 percent for Clinton.
CA-35 (Inland Empire): 70.0 percent Latino, 56.6 percent for Clinton.
CA-38 (East LA suburbs): 61.2 percent Latino, 56.9 percent for Clinton.
CA-41 (Riverside County): 59.1 percent Latino, 56.4 percent for Clinton
CA-44 (LA County): 70.5 percent Latino, 60.1 percent for Clinton.
CA-51 (San Diego and Imperial County): 69.1 percent Latino, 58.0 percent for Clinton.
Those polls, on average, missed an easy Clinton rout in California and they seem to have missed her resilience with Latino voters. Clinton won all 12 of the California congressional districts where Latino voters make up supermajorities of the population. (Sanders appears to have won just two districts, the largely white and rural 1st and 2nd districts of northern California.) Both Clinton and Sanders campaigned in the state's most heavily Latino seat, the 40th, which covers east Los Angeles. There, 86.6 percent of the population is Latino, and 55.4 percent of voters broke for Clinton.
It was a similar story across the state, though Sanders's vote was stronger where voters skewed younger. Clinton did worst just 51.5 percent of the vote in the 34th district, which is 66.5 percent Latino and covers downtown Los Angeles. She did only slightly better (52.0 percent) in Orange County's 46th district, one of the parts of the state that swung from Republican to safely Democratic as younger Latinos moved in.
The rest of the picture is below. In all of these districts, save CA-29, Clinton ran ahead of her statewide margin.
CA-16 (Central Valley): 58.1 percent Latino, 58.7 percent for Clinton.
CA-21 (Central Valley): 72.1 percent Latino, 62.7 percent for Clinton.
CA-29 (San Fernando Valley): 67.7 percent Latino, 53.7 percent for Clinton.
CA-32 (East LA sprawl): 61.9 percent Latino, 58.0 percent for Clinton.
CA-35 (Inland Empire): 70.0 percent Latino, 56.6 percent for Clinton.
CA-38 (East LA suburbs): 61.2 percent Latino, 56.9 percent for Clinton.
CA-41 (Riverside County): 59.1 percent Latino, 56.4 percent for Clinton
CA-44 (LA County): 70.5 percent Latino, 60.1 percent for Clinton.
CA-51 (San Diego and Imperial County): 69.1 percent Latino, 58.0 percent for Clinton.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/06/08/californias-most-latino-congressional-districts-broke-for-clinton/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1196 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WashPo: California’s most Latino congressional districts broke for Clinton (HRC GP) (Original Post)
Her Sister
Jun 2016
OP
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)1. KNR Thank you!
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)2. I knew they wouldn't let her down! Hence the need for a diverse ticket when time comes for her to
choose a VP running mate. I'm pretty sure everyone by now knows who I'm rooting for.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)3. Gracias! I knew the reports of Latinos breaking for Sanders had to be bogus!
It just made no sense!
Tarheel_Dem
(31,443 posts)4. Si se puede!
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)5. K&R
ismnotwasm
(42,456 posts)6. Wow!
Impressive