Now she's off to a good start in North Dakota too:

[spooky3]

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results

68+% with 4% of the vote in

also hanging onto the 9 %age point lead in SD with about a third of the vote in

[spooky3]

1. Sanders has surged ahead in ND. HRC's lead is narrowing in SD but still good, with 43% reporting.

I don't know why NJ hasn't been updated.

[book_worm]

2. Per Benchmark: North Dakota is feeling the bern as Sanders is out to a 30 point margin with 20% rep

Well ND is a caucus and that is where Bernie does best.

[spooky3]

3. yes

[tarheelsunc]

4. Caucuses are extremely dumb. I hope they are gone in four years.

Not saying Clinton would win a primary in ND, but look at the disparity between ND and SD. They are not THAT different demographically. Caucuses are long drawn-out bumbling clusterfucks that serve only to suppress the vote.

[SunSeeker]

5. Exactly. Caucuses enable bullies to suppress the votes of working people and parents.

People with kids (and a life) don't have time for that shit.

There is no justification for a caucus over a primary. And there is no justification for not allowing mail-in ballots.