Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Barack Obama
Related: About this forum* BOG Group* Obama's audacious foreign policy
http://wilsonquarterly.com/quarterly/the-post-obama-world/the-grandmaster-logic-behind-obamas-audacious-foreign-policy/Some excerpts:
There are, nevertheless, those who see Obama as very much ahead of his time. Noted University of Wisconsin history professor Alfred W. McCoy has called Obama the Grandmaster of the Great Game quite the superlative coming from a peer of the original architects of Americas rise to global power, Elihu Root and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Moving from repair to revival, from past to future, President Obama has been using Americas status as the planets number one consumer nation to create a new version of dollar diplomacy, wrote McCoy in a September 2015 analysis. His strategy is aimed at drawing Chinas Eurasian trading partners back into Washingtons orbit. While Beijing has been moving to bring parts of Africa, Asia, and Europe into a unified world island with China at its epicenter, Obama has countered with a bold geopolitics that would trisect that vast land mass by redirecting its trade towards the United States. McCoy's notion is that there's a grand unified theory behind the Obama foreign policy. Obamas orderly plan within a disorderly world? Integration of the global economy, with the United States as its epicenter. For McCoy, it's the lodestar that has guided much of the president's foreign policy even the process of normalizing relations with Iran and Cuba fall neatly into this framework.
. . . .
And what of Obamas military restraint? His grand strategy seems to favor a shift from geopolitics to geoeconomics. Amid massive migration-inducing nation-building crises and other instabilities across the global south, there is a discernible shift toward strategic devolution: the notion that regional powers and stakeholders must themselves address the challenges these disorders are throwing up. The logic of multipolarity leads to what is, essentially, a loosely federalist world order. While there is considerable resistance to this idea among America's liberals and conservatives, the nation-building vehicle of last resort must take the form of a reinvigorated, perhaps regionally reconfigured, United Nations not the United States.
Again, this seems to be the logic of Obamas foreign policy: transitioning America from an era when it is the sole global hegemon into a new era with several great competing powers, where America maintains its centrality by leading global integration.This strategy demands a transition in U.S. foreign policy thinking, wherein the country shifts away from the Pax Americana model, and towards a more UN-centric power-sharing order within which Washingtons global leadership is embedded.. . .
In what amounts to an evolution toward global economic federalism, the outlines of such an era, depending on how Americas domestic politics unfold, could mean an America-centric global economic order, accompanied by American strategic leadership embedded in a reformed and regionalized United Nations.. . . In the aftermath of Obamas presidency, the legacy of the Obamas will continue as a work in progress against the backdrop of a nation and world in transition. Both from a domestic and international standpoint, the possible outcomes seem endless. This could well be the Obama Century. America and the world would be the better for it.
. . . .
And what of Obamas military restraint? His grand strategy seems to favor a shift from geopolitics to geoeconomics. Amid massive migration-inducing nation-building crises and other instabilities across the global south, there is a discernible shift toward strategic devolution: the notion that regional powers and stakeholders must themselves address the challenges these disorders are throwing up. The logic of multipolarity leads to what is, essentially, a loosely federalist world order. While there is considerable resistance to this idea among America's liberals and conservatives, the nation-building vehicle of last resort must take the form of a reinvigorated, perhaps regionally reconfigured, United Nations not the United States.
Again, this seems to be the logic of Obamas foreign policy: transitioning America from an era when it is the sole global hegemon into a new era with several great competing powers, where America maintains its centrality by leading global integration.This strategy demands a transition in U.S. foreign policy thinking, wherein the country shifts away from the Pax Americana model, and towards a more UN-centric power-sharing order within which Washingtons global leadership is embedded.. . .
In what amounts to an evolution toward global economic federalism, the outlines of such an era, depending on how Americas domestic politics unfold, could mean an America-centric global economic order, accompanied by American strategic leadership embedded in a reformed and regionalized United Nations.. . . In the aftermath of Obamas presidency, the legacy of the Obamas will continue as a work in progress against the backdrop of a nation and world in transition. Both from a domestic and international standpoint, the possible outcomes seem endless. This could well be the Obama Century. America and the world would be the better for it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1510 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
* BOG Group* Obama's audacious foreign policy (Original Post)
MBS
Feb 2016
OP
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)1. The ties that bind.
It is a global economy.
Our greatest export should be democracy and American idealism. Which requires us to behave in exemplary fashion.
We - everyone on the planet - just want a better life, a better future. America needs to promote the things that make the world better, and oppose the things that don't. Sounds simple, doesn't it?
MBS
(9,688 posts)2. Nicely summarized, thanks.
But never underestimate the capacity of humans to make simple issues complicated.