Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Barack Obama

Lady Freedom Returns

(14,120 posts) Mon Jun 8, 2015, 04:51 PM Jun 2015

The President Meets with the Prime Minister of Iraq

It is 14:35 minutes long but worth it!

Published on Jun 8, 2015
President Obama delivers remarks after meeting with Prime Minister Al-Abadi of Iraq. June 8, 2015.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The President Meets with the Prime Minister of Iraq (Original Post) Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2015 OP

This is a mess. yallerdawg Jun 2015 #1

Obama inherited this mess thanks to a war monger. Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2015 #2

450 advisors. yallerdawg Jun 2015 #3

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)

1. This is a mess.

Reply to Lady Freedom Returns (Original post)

Mon Jun 8, 2015, 06:32 PM

Jun 2015

This is the most uncomfortable and even unhappy if not just disengaged President Obama ever appears.

"Why, why , why..." it looks like he is thinking.

Iraq is like Viet Nam. We just can't get out without a "bad" outcome for Iraq.

Lady Freedom Returns

(14,120 posts)

2. Obama inherited this mess thanks to a war monger.

Reply to yallerdawg (Reply #1)

Wed Jun 17, 2015, 03:20 PM

Jun 2015

And I fear that it will take reincarnation of FDR to get us out. The president is doing his best, but this is something that was brewing well before he was elected. At lest he keeps trying, that is one of many great things about this president, he never just gives up!

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)

3. 450 advisors.

Reply to Lady Freedom Returns (Reply #2)

Wed Jun 17, 2015, 03:28 PM

Jun 2015

Sounds like Kennedy.

At least we have Democratic precedent.

Reply to this discussion