Democrats
Related: About this forumCover of Germany's Der Spiegel June issue, titled "Fire Devil: A President Burns Down His Country
Cover of Germany's Der Spiegel June issue, titled "Fire Devil: A President Burns Down His Country"
gristy
(10,719 posts)Der Spiegel (German pronunciation: [deːɐ̯ ˈʃpiːɡl̩], lit. "The Mirror" ) is a far-left German weekly news magazine published in Hamburg.[1] With a weekly circulation of 840,000 copies, it is the largest such publication in Europe.[2][3][4]
It was founded in 1947[5] by John Seymour Chaloner, a British army officer, and Rudolf Augstein, a former Wehrmacht radio operator who was recognised in 2000 by the International Press Institute as one of the fifty World Press Freedom Heroes.[6] Typically, the magazine has a content to advertising ratio of 2:1.
Der Spiegel is known in German-speaking countries mostly for its investigative journalism. It has played a key role in uncovering many political scandals such as the Spiegel scandal in 1962 and the Flick affair in the 1980s. According to The Economist, Der Spiegel is one of continental Europe's most influential magazines.[7]
gristy
(10,719 posts)Cha
(305,397 posts)I posted that warned us about trump but they didn't listern
thucythucy
(8,742 posts)though perhaps in America it would be considered so.
I always thought it mainstream leaning left, or maybe left, but "far-left?"
It's not like it's something from the Sparacist League or the SWP.
ananda
(30,813 posts).. and truth.
thucythucy
(8,742 posts)And by labeling it "far left" it loses credibility in the eyes of many Americans.
I find German reporting on American politics by and large to be far more inciteful (and fact based) than most American reporting.
One side effect of the Trump plague: for the time being at least i will be unable to visit my German family (and they certainly don't want to come here).
Best wishes.
wnylib
(24,376 posts)as in giving insight or greater understanding to something.
"Incite" is arousing people to action, as in inciting a riot.
A way to remember the spelling difference is by associating the "sight" in insight with "seeing" into something to understand it.
thucythucy
(8,742 posts)Thanks for the tip!
Roy Rolling
(7,171 posts)Someone should edit the page, unless Der Spiegel wants to be labeled far left.
hopeforchange2008
(610 posts)soldierant
(7,892 posts)would e considered "center-right" in most of the world.
BlueMTexpat
(15,496 posts)at worst.
Mickju
(1,812 posts)think4yourself
(850 posts)Ich hab keine idee where that came from.
wnylib
(24,376 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,845 posts)It didn't say it was far-left. Maybe someone changed it and they changed it back. Or did you add that?
scipan
(2,636 posts)gristy
(10,719 posts)It said "far-left" when I posted. Someone made an edit. My guess the 2nd edit in the list below
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Der_Spiegel&action=history
curprev 15:05, 14 July 2020 136.49.154.252 talk 28,402 bytes +1 https everywhere undo
curprev 14:38, 14 July 2020 86.88.192.119 talk 28,401 bytes -12 Der spiegel does not implicitly state a political bias. undo
curprev 14:31, 14 July 2020 IamNotU talk contribs m 28,413 bytes +3 Reverted edits by 12.184.88.178 (talk) to last version by Alcaios undo Tag: Rollback
curprev 13:45, 14 July 2020 12.184.88.178 talk 28,410 bytes -3 undo
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Evolve Dammit
(18,604 posts)Captain Zero
(7,505 posts)Maybe here where everything has skewed to the far right, but Spiegel is owned and operated by Gruner and Jahr, And Bertelsmann AG. They are not leftist corporations, probably just cognizant of their role in the press to root out out corruption and perfidy.
WinstonSmith4740
(3,157 posts)Maybe I'm seeing what I want to, but I can never remember seeing any man's cuffs lift that far off his wrist.
Scalded Nun
(1,331 posts)patphil
(6,941 posts)McKim
(2,412 posts)Can you imagine the French tolerating this? This country is so passive!!!!! This is frustrating.
ancianita
(38,516 posts)But then, our legal structures have tried everything.
So that legal structure will have to be change with new laws passed by a new Congress, signed by a new president.
jaxexpat
(7,785 posts)to see themselves reflected by their bank account. If it's okay, then all is well. If it's not, then we must blame ourselves. And that people without bank accounts have simply chosen not exist at all. They're invisible. Nothing can be done with them that wouldn't threaten our bank accounts. We're powerless, we could go bankrupt or be reduced to homelessness if we allow ourselves to express or even HAVE considerations outside the lines of personal accounting.
If we had a more comprehensive social support network, like any part of Europe does, for instance, then maybe more would allow themselves the bother of actually giving a damn enough to speak up.
ancianita
(38,516 posts)the de-commodifying of human bodies. No one is qualified to put a price on human bodies. No human is to be valued by currency or commodification systems. We should support Black Lives Matter as the catalyst for speaking up, along with those who are doing that by protesting with them.
Look for the vanguards and make everyone pay attention to them enough to shift directions under law.
sumus
(23 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)zentrum
(9,866 posts)......misses Obama.
MontanaMama
(24,018 posts)Skittles
(159,240 posts)NBachers
(18,131 posts)bucolic_frolic
(46,973 posts)BigmanPigman
(52,241 posts)warmfeet
(3,321 posts)this is how the majority of the world currently see us.
They see we are in steep decline, perhaps going over the ultimate cliff - never to recover.
We may still have a chance. That chance starts on November 3rd. It's an end, but also a new beginning.
Archetypist
(218 posts)Far from it.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)Quemado
(1,262 posts)It would be like icing on a cake.