Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Election Reform
Related: About this forumTracking watermarks on ballots ruled illegal in WA State
Please read the press release in the email below.
This is a huge win for all of us, and especially for my friends Tim White and Allan Rosato. They are citizen plaintiffs in a case against former Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed. Reed did everything possible to draw out the case, which took about 8 years to be completed. The case revolved around Reed and WA county auditors placing unique barcodes on each voters ballot. What this means is, that the bar code makes it possible for election officials to theoretically identify, track, store, and possibly change votes by individual voters. The WA Constitution mandates a secret ballot. If there is a unique barcode on every ballot, which can then be used to identify individual voters, the ballot is no longer secret. Tim and Allan have spent a lot of time and money on this case. I am so grateful to them for their passion and tenacity in pursuing this case.
Back in 2009 Jason Osgood and I, among several other people dedicated to election integrity, lobbied the King County Council to ban bar codes on ballots. At that time, King County Elections was in the process of purchasing new ballot counting equipment and software and planned to place unique barcodes on individual ballots. Our efforts lead to the King County Council passing an ordinance banning barcodes on King Countys ballots (in KC, barcodes are only placed on the outside mail ballot envelope). Many other WA counties do use the now banned bar code.
--Elizabeth Walter (WA State election integrity activist
LOCAL CITIZENS PREVAIL IN SEVEN-YEAR BATTLE
(FRIDAY HARBOR, WA, 5 April 2013) Last week, San Juan County Superior Court Judge Donald E. Eaton ruled that a controversial voting system using voter-identifying barcodes on ballots is illegal. The system has been used for years in several Washington counties. Similar lawsuits are underway in Colorado.
Local voters and the San Juan County Green Party prevailed over former Secretary of State Sam Reed and San Juan County Auditor Milene Henley in a citizen suit originally brought by Orcas Island residents Tim White and Allan Rosato in 2006. The two seek to remove the unique ballot bar codes.
The system, dubbed VoteHere Mail-in Ballot Tracker (MiBT), is a paperless election tracking, processing and auditing software package. A series of processing station time stamps purports to track each ballot from the time it was sent to the voter to the time it was counted. On March 27 Judge Eaton ruled that MiBT is an integral part of the voting system, and required to undergo rigorous certification. State law prohibits voting systems not certified under the legislatures program of public examination and expert testing.
White and Rosato decided to pursue the suit after intensive sampling of MiBT tracking data posted online by San Juan County in 2005. They documented anomalies suggesting inconsistent, impossible and changed ballot tracks for some ten percent of voters: ballots counted before they were received, two ballots accepted from the same voter, ballots received and counted though never sent out, and dozens received and signature-accepted but not counted. The two became even more concerned when, after they presented their findings and the election was certified, much of the inconsistent tracks were suddenly fixed with new entriesand then returned to its original confused state two months later.
For Rosato, the issue struck to the core of his confidence as a voter: Not only was the code for this proprietary software not available for public inspection, it hadnt even gone through the voting system certification process. So how were we, as voters, to knowfirst of all, that the software was working properlyand second, that it wasnt being used for other purposes, such as manipulating votes or linking voters to their votes?
The case is spiced with charges that Secretary Reed awarded millions in no-bid contracts to the tiny company, VoteHere, whose chairman and chief lobbyist, Ralph Munro, was Reeds mentor and campaign chair. VoteHeres principals also included several U.S. intelligence power brokers, such as Robert Gates, former U.S. Secretary of Defense and head of the CIA.
White is ready for change. We sustained this effort to expose and block the push-button election rigging and secret ballot snooping capabilities we documented. The gavel is down for San Juan and other counties to stop using this rogue voting system. Its past time to remove unique bar codes from our ballots and to open up this black box voting system to public certification testing. Judge Eaton affirmed citizen rights to know how our votes are counted.
Seattle public interest attorney Knoll Lowney represents White, Rosato and the Green Party of San Juan County, where the offending voting system was first deployed. Lowney said "It is unfortunate that a lawsuit was required to force the Secretary of State and San Juan County to protect these voters' confidence in the voting system. Every voter should have an equal right to vote on a certified system and these voters were denied that protection."
Across the street from Judge Eatons chambers, San Juan County officials are busy issuing ballots for the April 23 Special Election. Auditor Henley ignored the decision in her interview in Wednesdays local media, and has not responded to inquiry whether they are still using the tracking and auditing voting system now officially ruled illegal.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 2411 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tracking watermarks on ballots ruled illegal in WA State (Original Post)
eridani
Apr 2013
OP
nenagh
(1,925 posts)1. Thank you for posting this...
Ballots with bar codes? Unbelievable.... Huge vote of thanks for Tim White and Allan Rosato.