Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Election Reform
Related: About this forumThe latest on Anchorage's April municipal election.
This is more and more looking deliberate.
http://www.themudflats.org/2012/07/24/the-muni-played-favorites-with-ballot-distribution/
The Muni played favorites with ballot distribution
In last weeks installment of the Municipality of Anchorages continuing 2012 Election debacle, new Municipal Clerk Barbara Jones made a disturbing find while attempting to (quite literally) clean up the old Municipal Clerks mess 141 unaccounted-for ballots.
This has led the trusty Election Commission to meet this coming Thursday and review the ballots they missed the first two times around.
While all of that has been going on, members of our Recount Observation Team have continued to research and slowly pursue the auditing process the Municipality has refused to provide.
and its been free of charge
The latest bombshell was discovered by dogged number-cruncher Jeanne Friedman. She (like the rest of us) was disgusted that the Munis multiple reports on the blank ballots distributed to each precinct did not add up. Descrepancies occurred in the vast majority of precincts and sometimes to the tune of hundreds of ballots in a single precinct.
Her Comparison of Election Reports shows these descrepancies and by themselves they are disturbing. However, what she discovered by accident was downright infuriating.
The Municipality played favorites on how they distributed blank ballots to each precinct.
<snip>
This is how they do it. Precincts in poor and minority neighborhoods received the bare minimum of ballots, almost guaranteeing that they would run out. Precincts in wealthy, conservative neighborhoods received up to 101% of the number of ballots required by municipal code. There's no way this was accidental.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 2322 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The latest on Anchorage's April municipal election. (Original Post)
Blue_In_AK
Jul 2012
OP
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)1. This is not democracy
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)2. Thanks Blue.
Very infuriating.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)3. I don't understand why there aren't big articles about these findings
in the ADN. This is important -- and, as you say -- infuriating news. There's no way you can convince me that this election wasn't rigged, and I'm sure Hizzoner, Jim Minnery, Jerry Prevo, et al., knew all about it.