Lee Camp rips NYT reporter for article on exit polling data and fraudulent elections.

[Stevepol]

Lee Camp does a good job of tearing a NYT article apart for its article about the unreliability of exit polling. The only people who think that exit polls might suggest fraudulent results are the "conspiracy theorists," the article says. But as Camp points out, there's a lot of BS in the Times article that needs to be exposed since the same arguments are always used and will be used again and again to explain away the next election where the exit polls differ from the final computer-counted results. And there will be many more occasions of this happening, we can be sure of that.

[1StrongBlackMan]

1. Why do so many on the left care more about what a comedian/actor/celebrity ...

has to say on a given topic, more than what academics have to say on that topic?