Election Reform
Related: About this forumI Will Tell You Now Who Will Win The 2016 Presidential Race
Last edited Sun May 15, 2016, 01:17 AM - Edit history (1)
The winner is whoever I program the electronic voting machines to say won.
Sorry Charlie.
It's all up to me and my "programming" and "tabulation / reporting" friends.
Go ahead and vote all you want.
Just don't ever think your vote will be counted, if it is not for the "selected" candidate.
Rec if you want to go back to paper ballots, counted by absolutely open methods.
CrispyQ
(38,299 posts)We will not get our government back until we address our compromised & corrupt process. We need:
1. Publicly funded elections.
2. Defined election periods - no more perpetual election cycles.
3. Reconfigure districts fairly.
4. Paper ballots - everywhere. Hand counted. No tabulators.
5. National election day with equal access to all.
6. Term limits for Congress.
I'm sure there's more, but this would be a start. Fat chance any of that is going to happen.
I think TPTB are in it for HRC & come hook or crook, she will be the prez. I have absolutely no confidence in our process.
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)Webcams to witness counting and to guard ballot boxes. The entire world (wide web) is available to help keep an eye on them.
LiberalArkie
(16,532 posts)total and then recounted by the thousands of hired poll workers it will be time to do it all over again in November for the general election. That it cutting it pretty close for the president to be sworn in in January.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)CrispyQ
(38,299 posts)zentrum
(9,866 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)TonyPDX
(962 posts)Them's the consequences of being too pissed to care anymore.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)1. No. Not one dollar of my taxes is going to pay for the campaigns of Donald Trump, Louie Goehmert and Steve King.
2. I agree in theory. But you can't really forbid anyone from campaigning as early as they want.
3. Of course I agree. But who defines what constitutes "fair"?
4. Yes, or scantron fill in the bubble ballots. As long as there is a paper trail.
5. Hell yes.
6. Yes, but that will require a constitutional amendment (a tall order). I'd say two terms in the Senate, 6 for the House.
I would add a 7. Compulsory voting, but the government shouldn't be able to send somebody to jail for not voting. We have enough people in jail as it is.
PJMcK
(22,897 posts)Your idea for compulsory voting is good and you're right about our jails. What if you don't vote, you pay a fee on your income taxes. Would people skip voting if it cost them $100?
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Been there since 2004.
Jackilope
(819 posts)saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)you can't predict for our fellow citizens.
I do agree on preventing electronic voter fraud possibilities. We have the best on our side.
Should the republicans try to "cook the books", we are watching.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Like Florida 1999 and Ohio 2003.
More problems than electronic voting machines.
Jeb Bush, Katherine Harris, and Ken Blackwell should have been hung for their election fraud.
They make it impossible to vote, and they walk every time.
Almost to the point of why bother.....
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Soxfan58
(3,479 posts)He said sarcastically
scottie55
(1,400 posts)They kicked 100,000 legitimate voters off the rolls because their names sounded like minorities.
They never were prosecuted.
And we allow it to happen.
We deserve to be screwed.
L. Coyote
(51,134 posts)The Republicans shave points every way possible and know how to get away with it. You can't prosecute someone when you cannot prove a crime was committed by them.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Why is it so hard in the USA to let people vote and then make sure their votes are counted accurately?
Volaris
(10,600 posts)And return it to where it RIGHTFULLY belongs..an honest, unbought Congress (or, at least one that's bought and paid for by Public Funding of elections) that is responsive to US.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Funny how no candidate, Party official of campaign manager claims that a loss what due to vote manipulation (including Bernie Sanders in 2016).
Funny as well that since rigged voting machines supposedly were introduced, Republicans have won three elections (2004, 2010 and 2014) and Democrats have won...three elections (2006, 2008, 2012).
Is there a warranty on the equipment?
dynamo99
(48 posts)It would be very difficult to rig enough machines (and get away with it) to tip the Presidential race.
Lower races would be a lot easier. Less attention being paid, fewer machines to rig. Just enough to tip the balance in the state legislature, in time for redistricting. Depends on the machines and how secure the programming is. As long as the software is proprietary (trade secret), nobody can check. If I were the evil genius, that's how I'd do it.
Not that I think it's happening much. Far better just to disenfranchise the opposition's voters and tip the scales that way. Or gerrymander. If the rubes yell about the people who were purged from the rolls, incompetence and lack of resources are good covers. There's no question that's happening.
At the state convention level, you don't need anything that complicated to adjust results. Whoever controls the rules and credentials committees, and whoever chairs the convention, they control the outcome. The apparatchniks have the experience, and they know the ins and outs of parliamentary practice.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)You can always be depended on to protect and defend the kleptocracy. Be proud.
JEB
(4,748 posts)merkins
(399 posts)L. Coyote
(51,134 posts)Actually, we do count, and that is their greatest fear.
If you did not count, they wouldn't need to gerrymander.
Hacking_Democracy
(9 posts)The question is - who is programming the machines now?
Pharaoh
(8,209 posts)dip your finger in purple ink if it makes the fascists feel any better.
Fuckwads"
TwilightZone
(28,833 posts)So, it's not entirely in the hands of the machines.
I'm all for 100% verifiable results, but personally, I think stuff like this discourages people from voting because they believe it doesn't matter. It does matter, particularly in state and local races where we need to do everything we can to get Democrats elected.
I think we can do both - encourage people to GOTV and work hard toward getting comprehensive changes made to the way we vote in this country.
But, that's just me.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Maybe we did and maybe we didn't.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,163 posts)Snarkoleptic
(6,029 posts)It will be the Corporatocracy and it's bought/paid for enablers. eom
Dustlawyer
(10,518 posts)Even if it is Trump, he will deal with them so they get what they want in the end.
joanbarnes
(1,887 posts)dobleremolque
(896 posts)"Those who cast the vote control nothing. Those who count the vote control everything."
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Most interesting.
zentrum
(9,866 posts)
our Democracy. If we ever really had it. Considering the real history of this country.
And currently, Electronic voting+Citizen's United bribery=Corptocracy.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)Grandpa, played by Ted Cruz Al Lewis, was running for mayor or something, and invented a machine that would flip votes his way. Of course, it was meant as a joke, but I remember thinking how prescient it was.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)How else could he win.
L. Coyote
(51,134 posts)In fact, given the elections are rigged, throw every winner in jail right now. OP, you see the flaw in your logic yet?
Absolutely logical thing to do since the premise must be true because someone on DU said it.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)L. Coyote
(51,134 posts)You won't believe how many people are falling for this BS.
Oh wait, you are one of them, and you are spreading it around.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...and yet Murrka has the balls to tell other people how to run elections....
Andy823
(11,527 posts)Although with a new twist. I am sure Karl Rove and Donald Trump would rec your post.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)and the Koch Bros.
How can we change a system that is controlled by the oligarchy?
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Where plenty of people can attend. Auditoriums, gyms, convention spaces, whatever large space is publicly accessible.
Bring it on!
Cly
(18 posts)I promise I'll spend the money wisely, e.g., free beer for all servicepeople. It'll make them happy and prevent them from carrying out illegal orders!
merrily
(45,251 posts)JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)First elected droid.
historian
(2,475 posts)remember and the election fraud of the diebold (is that the right name?) voting machines which said company is a major republican contributor?