Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 11:31 AM Jul 2020

Rift between royal brothers laid bare in new book extract

LONDON (AP) — Prince William infuriated Prince Harry when he told his younger brother he should move slowly in his relationship with the former Meghan Markle, fearing that he was being “blindsided by lust,’’ a new book on the Windsors says.

The second installment of a serialized version of the book “Finding Freedom,” which appeared in the Sunday Times, claimed that Harry was angered by what he perceived as William’s snobby tone in a discussion about the American actress when they were dating. Royal reporters Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand wrote that Harry disliked William’s advice to “take as much time as you need to get to know this girl."

The authors quote a source close to William as saying he didn’t want Harry to be “blindsided by lust.” The authors wrote that Harry “no longer felt as though he needed looking after,” and took it badly. “In those last two words, ‘this girl’, Harry heard the tone of snobbishness that was anathema to his approach to the world,’’ the excerpt said, noting that Harry has spent 10 years in the military and outside the royal bubble. “Also, to remove Meghan from the equation, Harry was tired of the dynamic that had become established between him and his older brother,’’ the authors added.

In announcing the book's publication, Harper Collins U.K. said the book by Scobie, royal editor of Harper’s Bazaar and Durand, Elle magazine's royal correspondent, would aim to capture “the real Harry and Meghan." The publisher said the authors have been given “unique access” and the cooperation of those closest to the couple.

Ahead of the book’s release, Harry and Meghan issued a statement denying taking part in the publication. “The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were not interviewed and did not contribute to ‘Finding Freedom’,’’ it said. “This book is based on the authors’ own experiences as members of the royal press corps and their own independent reporting.”

https://www.usnews.com/news/entertainment/articles/2020-07-26/rift-between-royal-brothers-laid-bare-in-new-book-extract

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rift between royal brothers laid bare in new book extract (Original Post) left-of-center2012 Jul 2020 OP
'this girl', That is what popped for me. LizBeth Jul 2020 #1
In what way? It doesn't seem to be an unusual way at all for a family member to Squinch Jul 2020 #4
Grown men are not addressed a boys. I think grown women shouldn't continually be addressed as girls. LizBeth Jul 2020 #5
That's nice, but my point holds. Squinch Jul 2020 #6
Right back at you. Nice, but my point holds. It is condescending, Harry felt it was condescending LizBeth Jul 2020 #9
Lololol. Riduculous. Both older men and women are referred to Celerity Jul 2020 #14
Would you accept that there are some social contexts Denzil_DC Jul 2020 #15
yes Celerity Jul 2020 #17
Since it's not a direct quote, but what an unnamed source reported he said muriel_volestrangler Jul 2020 #12
I am hardly worked up about. About at the point of really don't give an iota about this story. LizBeth Jul 2020 #13
The English are so interesting about their monarchy. They love it, but at the same time Squinch Jul 2020 #2
You'd be surprised how many of us want to see Ghost Dog Jul 2020 #8
One major problem I have with Republicanism in the UK... T_i_B Jul 2020 #10
I'd advocate a thoroughly backstage, purely constitutional role Ghost Dog Jul 2020 #16
It's a heinous dynamic. Denzil_DC Jul 2020 #11
I'm American, my partner is English. a la izquierda Aug 2020 #19
Dear me, a royal with a "snobby tone". Where's my fainting couch? unblock Jul 2020 #3
Sounds like The Globe LakeArenal Jul 2020 #7
Typical half-brotherly rivalry sandensea Jul 2020 #18

Squinch

(53,036 posts)
4. In what way? It doesn't seem to be an unusual way at all for a family member to
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 11:41 AM
Jul 2020

talk to another family member about a new girlfriend who, at the beginning of this relationship, was simply the latest in a long string of new girlfriends.

LizBeth

(10,864 posts)
5. Grown men are not addressed a boys. I think grown women shouldn't continually be addressed as girls.
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 11:43 AM
Jul 2020

LizBeth

(10,864 posts)
9. Right back at you. Nice, but my point holds. It is condescending, Harry felt it was condescending
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 01:28 PM
Jul 2020

and he did not like it. Yea, him.

Celerity

(46,536 posts)
14. Lololol. Riduculous. Both older men and women are referred to
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 06:54 PM
Jul 2020

or call each other boys or girls all the time. Talk about pedantic.

My boomer grandfather on the Swedish (father's) side always says he is out with the boys (or lads). Same for my mum and her group of female friends in London, most of whom are bankers (as is she), barristers, doctors, etc.

SMDH

Denzil_DC

(8,001 posts)
15. Would you accept that there are some social contexts
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 08:13 PM
Jul 2020

where the use of "boy" or "girl" can be demeaning, even deliberately so?

muriel_volestrangler

(102,618 posts)
12. Since it's not a direct quote, but what an unnamed source reported he said
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 06:05 PM
Jul 2020

it's hard to get worked up about it. It's hard to get worked up about the book at all, in fact. Royal correspondents have to keep their beat going somehow, I suppose. Can't have coronavirus getting in the way of a gossip story.

LizBeth

(10,864 posts)
13. I am hardly worked up about. About at the point of really don't give an iota about this story.
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 06:25 PM
Jul 2020

Or celebrities, or "royals". I made a two second comment. Hardly "worked up" about it.

Squinch

(53,036 posts)
2. The English are so interesting about their monarchy. They love it, but at the same time
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 11:39 AM
Jul 2020

they seem to need to find some scandal in it.

Given that none of the parties to this conversation took part in the book, it is unlikely the conversation even took place, but they sure are setting up poor Harry to be the bad guy in it.

And if it DID happen, I do feel sorry for both brothers for the fact that their intimate friends would dish to an author about their private interactions.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
8. You'd be surprised how many of us want to see
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 12:42 PM
Jul 2020

Last edited Mon Jul 27, 2020, 12:23 AM - Edit history (1)

an Irish-style English Republic; and a Scottish one too.

Ex-king Juan Carlos I of Spain became heir to the throne after killing his older brother with a shotgun. Perhaps Harry should have done something similar.

T_i_B

(14,805 posts)
10. One major problem I have with Republicanism in the UK...
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 01:36 PM
Jul 2020

...is that it focus's much too exclusively on abolishing the monarchy and says virtually nothing about what sort of constitution they would want in it's place. Which leads me to worry that we would end up with even less checks and balances than before.

Also, it's bad enough having Boris Johnson as Prime Minister, but imagine how much it would go to his head if he were made a President.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
16. I'd advocate a thoroughly backstage, purely constitutional role
Mon Jul 27, 2020, 12:18 AM
Jul 2020

for a president of a constitutional parliamentary Republic. Nothing like the Rome-imitators such as the USA or France. And, yes, getting the written Constitution, and proportionally-representative electoral system, including recall processes, right must come first.

Denzil_DC

(8,001 posts)
11. It's a heinous dynamic.
Sun Jul 26, 2020, 03:16 PM
Jul 2020

Diana, William and Harry's mother, was constant headline fodder while she was alive. The outpouring of ostentatious demonstrations of grief on her death, spearheaded on by the very same media that had spent years pilliorying her, and indeed was literally actively pursuing her when her car crashed, was sickening to many of us who may not wish any of them ill personally (with the possible exception of Andrew, given current revelations) for the accident of their birth, but don't have any time for royalty as an institution.

I remember when Harry and Meghan married. It was odd to see the enthusiasm among many US DUers for the royal family when feelings about them are very mixed and ambivalent among us in the UK. That the media turned on Meghan with ill-disguised racism wasn't really a surprise.

I think when Elizabeth finally dies or becomes so infirm she can no longer fulfil her duties, there will be a great recalibration of the role of royalty in the UK, perhaps on the model of some of the nordic countries, which think little or nothing of pomp and circumstance, and where their royals mix in public much like commoners.

a la izquierda

(11,908 posts)
19. I'm American, my partner is English.
Sat Aug 1, 2020, 08:25 PM
Aug 2020

He hates the monarchy. I find it interesting, but really only from a historical perspective.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Rift between royal brothe...