Australia
Related: About this forumThis Is How "Unsettled" Australia Was Before The British Arrived In 1788
http://www.buzzfeed.com/jennaguillaume/this-is-how-unsettled-australia-was-before-the-british
Squinch
(52,881 posts)and one of the really terrible things I am learning is the way the European diseases acted as a plague to the Native Americans. There are estimates that 90% of the Native American population died from European diseases between about 1500 and 1700 (those are not sourced dates, but just the impression I have of the time period from what I am reading.)
Did the same happen with the Aboriginal Australian population?
Violet_Crumble
(36,142 posts)I read somewhere that their population around the time of the First Fleet arriving was over 250,000 and by the early 20th century had dropped to around 60,000. Considering European settlement of America happened about 200 years before Australia, there's a lot of similarities. Not taking into account that settlers killed a lot of them, the main introduced disease I've always heard of was Smallpox.
I found a thesis on introduced diseases written by someone at the uni I went to before my work/study balance went out of whack and I had to drop out.
https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/bitstream/.../02Whole_Dowling.pdf
Squinch
(52,881 posts)I always imagine what it must have been like to be someone who survived, and saw 90% of his world die off. It was the end of the world for them.
Violet_Crumble
(36,142 posts)One really sad thing that I learnt when we were studying European settlement in Australia was that there was no resistance from the indigenous population around Sydney Cove when the First Fleet arrived. They apparently had no idea what that first bunch of settlers meant for them and their future, but must have been bemused watching that first lot running out of food when there was so much around them if they'd known where to look for it.
Here's the link. I hope this one works
https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/7529
Squinch
(52,881 posts)Squinch
(52,881 posts)hundred years."
That's so disturbing.
marble falls
(62,286 posts)History in the new world generally doesn't start until the white guy shows up.
Squinch
(52,881 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)An awesome read all about this stuff. It was the germs that wiped out so many native peoples.
marble falls
(62,286 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)It's on my "to-read" list.
marble falls
(62,286 posts)Cartoonist
(7,539 posts)I always like to jump in on threads like this to disparage religion. The natives weren't Christians, therefore they were savages. Killing them was not a sin, and the idea that they were God's children never entered the Christian mind. Whenever anyone spouts the absurd line about how much good religion does, I merely point out that religion has killed more people than any other group. And that includes the Nazis and the Commies. They number their victims only in the millions. Christianity numbers them by the continent.
marble falls
(62,286 posts)China that included diary and journal entries by a Baptist missionary that included one about how many Chinese he had converted and then sent onto Heaven by his own hand. That was some shocking stuff for a Missouri Synod Luther Leaguer. Then I found out the feet of clay Martin Luther walked on.
G*d is not so well served by churches much of the time. Its hypocritical to point so many fingers at Islam.
Wish I remember the title or author or at least what month it was in '64 or '65 the issue of Time came out.
I don't despair of religion so much as I find overt religionists despicable.
Cartoonist
(7,539 posts)It's a mob mentality. Individual humans can be decent and have a personal relation with spirituality. It's the organization of religion into a political force that degenerates into evil. It pits people against each other. There is blood spilled when protestants and catholics collide. Just as blood is being spilled when sunnis and shiites collide. Will we ever learn?