Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Signal says it can't allow government access to users' chats
From https://www.engadget.com/2018/12/14/signal-cant-allow-government-access/
Signal says it can't allow government access to users' chats
The company is responding to Australia’s controversial new law.
Mallory Locklear, @mallorylocklear
19h ago in Security
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Last week, the Australian government passed the country's controversial Access and Assistance Bill 2018 into law, legislation that allows government agencies to demand access to encrypted communications. Companies that don't comply with the new law could face fines of up to AU$10 million ($7.3 million). A number of companies that stand to be affected have spoken out about the legislation, and Signal has now joined in, explaining that it won't be able to fulfill such requests if asked.
"By design, Signal does not have a record of your contacts, social graph, conversation list, location, user avatar, user profile name, group memberships, group titles or group avatars," Signal's Joshua Lund wrote in a blog post. "The end-to-end encrypted contents of every message and voice/video call are protected by keys that are entirely inaccessible to us." Lund added that Signal is open source, meaning anyone can "verify or examine the code for each release." "People often use Signal to share secrets with their friends, but we can't hide secrets in our software," he wrote. "We can't include a backdoor in Signal."
Before the law was passed, Apple sent a letter to the Australian government, outlining its concerns about the bill. The company described portions of the bill as being "overly broad" while also noting a lack of judicial oversight and the global impact such a law stands to have. "There is profound risk of making criminals' jobs easier, not harder," Apple said. "Increasingly stronger -- not weaker -- encryption is the best way to protect against these threats." Similarly, the Reform Government Surveillance coalition, a group that includes Apple, Facebook, Google and Twitter, among others, released a statement saying Australia's law is "deeply flawed, overly broad and lacking in adequate independent oversight over the new authorities."
Tech companies and government agencies have continued to butt heads over access to communications, both in Australia and abroad. In the US, federal agencies have repeatedly called for backdoor access and tech firms have fought back against those demands in courtrooms.
...
The company is responding to Australia’s controversial new law.
Mallory Locklear, @mallorylocklear
19h ago in Security
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Last week, the Australian government passed the country's controversial Access and Assistance Bill 2018 into law, legislation that allows government agencies to demand access to encrypted communications. Companies that don't comply with the new law could face fines of up to AU$10 million ($7.3 million). A number of companies that stand to be affected have spoken out about the legislation, and Signal has now joined in, explaining that it won't be able to fulfill such requests if asked.
"By design, Signal does not have a record of your contacts, social graph, conversation list, location, user avatar, user profile name, group memberships, group titles or group avatars," Signal's Joshua Lund wrote in a blog post. "The end-to-end encrypted contents of every message and voice/video call are protected by keys that are entirely inaccessible to us." Lund added that Signal is open source, meaning anyone can "verify or examine the code for each release." "People often use Signal to share secrets with their friends, but we can't hide secrets in our software," he wrote. "We can't include a backdoor in Signal."
Before the law was passed, Apple sent a letter to the Australian government, outlining its concerns about the bill. The company described portions of the bill as being "overly broad" while also noting a lack of judicial oversight and the global impact such a law stands to have. "There is profound risk of making criminals' jobs easier, not harder," Apple said. "Increasingly stronger -- not weaker -- encryption is the best way to protect against these threats." Similarly, the Reform Government Surveillance coalition, a group that includes Apple, Facebook, Google and Twitter, among others, released a statement saying Australia's law is "deeply flawed, overly broad and lacking in adequate independent oversight over the new authorities."
Tech companies and government agencies have continued to butt heads over access to communications, both in Australia and abroad. In the US, federal agencies have repeatedly called for backdoor access and tech firms have fought back against those demands in courtrooms.
...
More at link.