Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Talitha

(7,447 posts)
Mon Mar 18, 2024, 12:47 PM Mar 2024

Regarding the April 2nd ballot

(First, my deepest apologies for always being confused by the wording on these referendum questions.)

These two will be on the April ballot - should I vote yes or no?
Thanks!!

State of Wisconsin Use of Private Funds in Election Administration Referendum
QUESTION 1: "Use of private funds in election administration. Shall section 7 (1) of article III of the constitution be created to provide that private donations and grants may not be applied for, accepted, expended, or used in connection with the conduct of any primary, election, or referendum?"
Yes
No

State of Wisconsin Election Officials Referendum
QUESTION 2: "Election officials. Shall section 7 (2) of article III of the constitution be created to provide that only election officials designated by law may perform tasks in the conduct of primaries, elections, and referendums?"
Yes
No
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Regarding the April 2nd ballot (Original Post) Talitha Mar 2024 OP
Wis Dems are recommending a no vote on both. sybylla Mar 2024 #1
Thank you SO much for your help, these doggone things are legal gibberish to me. Talitha Mar 2024 #2
You're welcome. sybylla Mar 2024 #3

sybylla

(8,655 posts)
1. Wis Dems are recommending a no vote on both.
Mon Mar 18, 2024, 01:37 PM
Mar 2024

As a poll worker I second that.

The first one is basically about blocking any grants to support election activities - like the Meta grants that happened in 2020.

I don't even know what the fuck the second one is trying to block. Contractors? Like those who produce election equipment? Does it mean that municipal clerks have to be on site for every election and cannot task employees with processing absentee ballot requests, conducting election day activities, etc? If only elected people oversee election tasks, managing the process will become ridiculous. Are they trying to put election results in large (read liberal) cities in danger of being rejected or questioned or abandoned all together due to processing delays?

This one should be shut down for everything.

sybylla

(8,655 posts)
3. You're welcome.
Mon Mar 18, 2024, 02:36 PM
Mar 2024

Right now the number one thing to remember is that constitutional amendments must be passed by two consecutive legislative sessions (after two elections) and the GQP has been in charge of the Wisconsin legislature the whole time.

Hopefully that is about to change.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Wisconsin»Regarding the April 2nd b...