Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Virginia
Related: About this forumJudge finds frozen embryos are not divisible property in cancer survivor's case against ex-husband
Judge finds frozen embryos are not divisible property in cancer survivor’s case against ex-husband
The Associated Press
March 17, 2025, 5:06 AM
FAIRFAX, Va. (AP) — A northern Virginia judge determined embryos are not property that can be divided up, rejecting a previous analysis by the court saying such fertilized eggs could be considered divisible “goods or chattel” based on 19th-century slave law.
Nearly 10 months after closing arguments, Fairfax Circuit Court Judge Dontaè L. Bugg wrote in an opinion letter earlier this month that he would dismiss a cancer survivor’s partition lawsuit against her ex-husband — a legal action that one property owner can take against another. The former wife, Honeyhline Heidemann, sued Jason Heidemann over access to two embryos they froze during a 2015 cycle of in vitro fertilization but agreed to leave in storage during their divorce three years later.
In the bench trial, Honeyhline Heidemann testified the embryos were her last chance to conceive another biological child after a cancer treatment. Jason Heidemann’s attorney argued he did not want to become a biological father to a child by force, even if he wasn’t required to be a parent.
{snip}
___
Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative.
Copyright © 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
The Associated Press
March 17, 2025, 5:06 AM
FAIRFAX, Va. (AP) — A northern Virginia judge determined embryos are not property that can be divided up, rejecting a previous analysis by the court saying such fertilized eggs could be considered divisible “goods or chattel” based on 19th-century slave law.
Nearly 10 months after closing arguments, Fairfax Circuit Court Judge Dontaè L. Bugg wrote in an opinion letter earlier this month that he would dismiss a cancer survivor’s partition lawsuit against her ex-husband — a legal action that one property owner can take against another. The former wife, Honeyhline Heidemann, sued Jason Heidemann over access to two embryos they froze during a 2015 cycle of in vitro fertilization but agreed to leave in storage during their divorce three years later.
In the bench trial, Honeyhline Heidemann testified the embryos were her last chance to conceive another biological child after a cancer treatment. Jason Heidemann’s attorney argued he did not want to become a biological father to a child by force, even if he wasn’t required to be a parent.
{snip}
___
Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative.
Copyright © 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Judge finds frozen embryos are not divisible property in cancer survivor's case against ex-husband (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 17
OP
Walleye
(39,234 posts)1. If he didn't wanna be a daddy, maybe he shouldn't have squirted out his semen
Amirite, girls?
Ilsa
(62,667 posts)2. I feel bad for the couple. They probably
spent tens of thousands of dollars (like $25k to start) with no guarantees of success. The extra two embryos were probably made from the same ejaculate that created their first baby. It's the sort of thing I think needs to be hashed out before starting the treatment. Decisions should be in place for not just divorce, but if either parent becomes sterile not through their own choice.