Texas
Related: About this forumTexas can no longer investigate alleged cases of vote harvesting, federal judge says
A federal judge ruled on Saturday that part of a Texas law that enacted new voting restrictions violated the U.S. Constitution by being too vague and restricting free speech.
The ruling, made by U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez, immediately halted the states ability to investigate alleged cases of vote harvesting, such as the investigation into the League of United Latin American Citizens by Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Before todays ruling, a person who knowingly provided or offered vote harvesting services in exchange for compensation was committing a third-degree felony. This meant that organizers of voter outreach organizations and even volunteers could spend up to ten years in prison and fined up to $10,000 for giving or offering these services.
According to Republican lawmakers, the provision was put in place to prevent voter fraud and secure election integrity. However, in the ruling, the judge noted that there was widespread confusion about how to implement the canvassing restriction from local election administrators. This confusion also left voter outreach organizations uncertain about whether they could provide volunteers with food or bus fare because it could look like compensation.
https://www.texastribune.org/2024/09/28/texas-vote-harvesting-law-unconstitutional/
BOSSHOG
(39,836 posts)Exactly what the intent was. Prevent fraud, secure integrity. Promoted by those with no integrity who plan to win using fraud as an instrument.
jimfields33
(18,837 posts)That of course takes work which they Loathe.
BOSSHOG
(39,836 posts)Excellent point my friend. Although harvesting is used as a pejorative by those who choose not to do good things. Making it easier to vote is what good people do. Bullshit legal roadblocks is what bad people do.