Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(70,613 posts)
Sat Sep 28, 2024, 08:19 PM Sep 28

Texas can no longer investigate alleged cases of vote harvesting, federal judge says

A federal judge ruled on Saturday that part of a Texas law that enacted new voting restrictions violated the U.S. Constitution by being too vague and restricting free speech.

The ruling, made by U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez, immediately halted the state’s ability to investigate alleged cases of vote harvesting, such as the investigation into the League of United Latin American Citizens by Attorney General Ken Paxton.

Before today’s ruling, a person who knowingly provided or offered vote harvesting services in exchange for compensation was committing a third-degree felony. This meant that organizers of voter outreach organizations and even volunteers could spend up to ten years in prison and fined up to $10,000 for giving or offering these services.

According to Republican lawmakers, the provision was put in place to prevent voter fraud and secure election integrity. However, in the ruling, the judge noted that there was widespread confusion about how to implement the canvassing restriction from local election administrators. This confusion also left voter outreach organizations uncertain about whether they could provide volunteers with food or bus fare because it could look like compensation.



https://www.texastribune.org/2024/09/28/texas-vote-harvesting-law-unconstitutional/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas can no longer investigate alleged cases of vote harvesting, federal judge says (Original Post) RandySF Sep 28 OP
WIDESPREAD CONFUSION BOSSHOG Sep 28 #1
Republicans are dumb. Why don't they harvest ballots? jimfields33 Sep 28 #2
Harvesting ballots is a good thing BOSSHOG Sep 28 #4
Vote harvesting sounds like it would be equal opportunity for both sides. keithbvadu2 Sep 28 #3

BOSSHOG

(39,836 posts)
1. WIDESPREAD CONFUSION
Sat Sep 28, 2024, 08:41 PM
Sep 28

Exactly what the intent was. Prevent fraud, secure integrity. Promoted by those with no integrity who plan to win using fraud as an instrument.

BOSSHOG

(39,836 posts)
4. Harvesting ballots is a good thing
Sat Sep 28, 2024, 09:24 PM
Sep 28

Excellent point my friend. Although “harvesting” is used as a pejorative by those who choose not to do good things. Making it easier to vote is what good people do. Bullshit legal roadblocks is what bad people do.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Texas can no longer inves...