Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(117,040 posts)
Fri Jun 2, 2017, 07:03 PM Jun 2017

Judge Manning nixes Columbia's bid to deny USC professor $200,075 for DUI arrest

COLUMBIA, SC -- Judge Casey Manning denied motions Friday morning by the city of Columbia’s legal department to overturn a $200,075 jury verdict in the case of a bungled DUI arrest by city police that resulted in an innocent man being tossed in jail.

After hearing a presentation from city lawyer Natalie Ham that a $200,075 jury award for Darris Hassell should be reduced or tossed out and the city given a new trial, Manning ruled from the bench and denied her motion.

On May 18, after a three-day trial, a Richland County jury of eight whites and four African-Americans took just 41 minutes to decide that the city should pay Hassell, 47, for being falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted.

Hassell, an African-American, had been arrested by a white officer, but race was not an issue in the case. Hassell did not resist his arrest, and the officer’s conduct was the main issue before the jury.

Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/news/local/crime/article154114499.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Manning nixes Columbia's bid to deny USC professor $200,075 for DUI arrest (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jun 2017 OP
And who pays the fine? Taxpayers, not cops or prosecutors sharedvalues Jun 2017 #1

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
1. And who pays the fine? Taxpayers, not cops or prosecutors
Fri Jun 2, 2017, 07:19 PM
Jun 2017

It's great the victim gets a settlement in cases of misconduct like this, but the cops and prosecutors that actually committed the misconduct are off the hook. They don't have to pay. The city (i.e. the taxpayer) pays.

We need to give cops and prosecutors who really commit crimes exposure to these judgements. Why should taxpayers be the only ones paying??

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»South Carolina»Judge Manning nixes Colum...