Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,799 posts)
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 07:38 AM Feb 2020

Study shows rural Pennsylvania school districts not benefiting from nearby fracking

Natural-gas industry boosters make several arguments for why natural-gas drilling, aka fracking, is beneficial for Pennsylvania. But their main argument, and one that is often repeated by Republican and many Democratic politicians, is economic. Industry boosters claim the economic growth and jobs, especially in rural areas, that come with the growth in the fracking industry is too good to pass up, even if health and environmental problems follow.

But a new study from Penn State University is shedding light on some of those claims, with a focus rural school districts where fracking is occurring, and it's not positive.

Titled “A ‘Resource Curse’ for Education?: Deepening Educational Disparities in Pennsylvania’s Shale Gas Boomtowns,” authors and Penn State education department professors Matthew Gardner Kelly and Kai A. Schafft dig into the school district revenues in areas that were home to drilling rigs in between 2007-2015.

“Evidence from our analysis suggests that, on average, districts experiencing unconventional drilling had lower per-pupil revenues, locally raised per-pupil funding for schools, per-pupil income, and per-public property wealth than very similar districts that did not experience unconventional drilling," reads the study.

Read more: https://www.pghcitypaper.com/pittsburgh/study-shows-rural-pennsylvania-school-districts-not-benefiting-from-nearby-fracking/Content?oid=16835301
(Pittsburgh City Paper)

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study shows rural Pennsylvania school districts not benefiting from nearby fracking (Original Post) TexasTowelie Feb 2020 OP
That's because the Repug-controlled state legislature Freddie Feb 2020 #1
This jumps out at me FakeNoose Feb 2020 #2

Freddie

(9,693 posts)
1. That's because the Repug-controlled state legislature
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 08:39 AM
Feb 2020

Refuses to put an excise tax in fracking. All other states that have natural resources (like that liberal bastion Texas) tax the crap out of it. But here, of course not.

FakeNoose

(35,687 posts)
2. This jumps out at me
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 08:44 AM
Feb 2020
In Pennsylvania, like most states, the wealthiest school districts tend to be in the suburbs. In the Pittsburgh area, the five wealthiest school districts all sit near the border of Allegheny County (Upper St. Clair, Peters Township, Pine-Richland, North Allegheny, and Mars Area), according to the Pittsburgh Business Times. Most fracking wells currently sit in Washington County, with large numbers in Butler and Westmoreland counties as well.

The study could suggest a phenomenon where fracking is actually contributing to a wealth transfer from rural to suburban school districts, possibly because those earning wealth in the fracking industry aren’t living in the rural communities that are experiencing the majority of the drilling.

“Despite promises that unconventional gas production would be an engine of economic opportunity, many Pennsylvania school districts continue to struggle financially, a struggle that appears to be worsened by gas development,” wrote Kelly and Schafft in a story for The Conversation.


It's time for Pennsylvania to correct this error. The argument that local rural schools are helped by the fracking industry has been shown to be FALSE! Fracking is ruining our environment and our water supplies, it hogs precious resources that could be directed to needier problems, and there's little proof that our local economy is improved. The profits and high-salary jobs are going to outsiders for the most part. When the oil is gone they'll be gone too, and we'll be cleaning up the mess they leave behind.

Is this the legacy we want for our grandchildren?



Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Study shows rural Pennsyl...