Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:03 PM Nov 2015

So far, looking like Yes on 1 and 2, no on 3 with 47.5% in.

Will it hold?

3 has already been called a failure, 1 is obviously going to be a success, so 2 is the only one still really up in the air now.


ETA Weirdly steady progression, with overall percentages basically not changing the more precincts report in.

With just over 25% of the vote now



State Issue 1 Creates a bipartisan, public process for drawing legislative districts

Selection Votes % of Votes
NO 274,858 27.95%
YES 708,528 72.05%
Total Votes Cast 983,386

State Issue 2 Anti-monopoly amendment; protects the initiative process from being used for personal economic benefit

Selection Votes % of Votes
NO 473,026 45.94%
YES 556,639 54.06%
Total Votes Cast 1,029,665

State Issue 3 Grants a monopoly for the commercial production and sale of marijuana for recreational and medicinal purposes

Selection Votes % of Votes
NO 688,683 65.74%
YES 358,869 34.26%
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So far, looking like Yes on 1 and 2, no on 3 with 47.5% in. (Original Post) Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 OP
Issue 2 is the worst possible law Travis_0004 Nov 2015 #1
Issue 3 is not the best law overall regarding marijuhana because of the business monopolies. Fred Sanders Nov 2015 #2
to the ill who would benefit from medical cannibus sorry but your relief just isnt worth a monopoly saturnsring Nov 2015 #3
 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
1. Issue 2 is the worst possible law
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:05 PM
Nov 2015

I really hope it fails. I voted yes one 1 and 3, but those are not as important to me as issue 2 failing.

(and remember, all hamilton county ballots cast between 7pm and 9pm were provisional. That means they will not be counted for 10 days, so if the race is close, we will be waiting for a while, but I doubt any will be that close.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
2. Issue 3 is not the best law overall regarding marijuhana because of the business monopolies.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 09:10 PM
Nov 2015

"The marijuana question, which was a main issue before voters, garnered some "no" votes from Ohioans who didn't like that a small group of investors would have exclusive rights to grow pot commercially.

"I can't believe I voted 'no' when it was finally on the ballot," said Marty Dvorchak, 62, of the northern Cincinnati suburb of Fairfield. "I think it's ridiculous that marijuana is illegal." But he said he had problems with the way the initiative is structured.

Steve Mosier, 61, of Cincinnati, also voted no because of similar concerns, even though he says he generally supports legalization."


http://m.wlwt.com/news/three-statewide-issues-await-ohio-voters-at-the-polls/36228676
 

saturnsring

(1,832 posts)
3. to the ill who would benefit from medical cannibus sorry but your relief just isnt worth a monopoly
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 11:27 AM
Nov 2015

better luck next year. Ohioans have spoken for you.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Ohio»So far, looking like Yes ...