Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(136,055 posts)
Thu Mar 1, 2018, 04:38 PM Mar 2018

Prepared for Bumps, the Met Starts Charging Non-New Yorkers.

'In the two months since the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced a momentous change for visitors — charging $25 to those who live outside New York State, instead of letting them pay what they wish — the museum has gone to great lengths to prepare for Day 1.

But as the new mandatory fee goes into effect Thursday morning, it is far from clear whether there will be chaos or business as usual in the Met’s Great Hall entry area; whether people will agreeably pay the required admission; and whether impassioned opponents will come to accept it.

“It’s like taking the jacket off a poor person,” the artist Ai Weiwei said of the new fee, which was announced in January. “I will never go to the Metropolitan. Am I calling for a boycott? No. But I myself will not go.”

Daniel Weiss, the Met’s president and chief executive officer, has made a concerted effort to explain why the new fee is necessary to bolster one of the world’s largest and most renowned cultural institutions. The proportion of museumgoers who pay a “suggested” amount has declined from 63 percent to 17 percent over the last 13 years, even as Met attendance has surged from 4.7 million to 7 million.

The Met has also been girding for the logistical challenges of checking proof of residence without segregating people in a separate line as if they were second-class visitors. (Students in the tristate region don’t have to pay the new fee, and the ticket is good for three days of admission to the Met, the Met Breuer and the Cloisters).'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/01/arts/design/metropolitan-museum-of-art-starts-charging-non-new-yorkers.html?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prepared for Bumps, the Met Starts Charging Non-New Yorkers. (Original Post) elleng Mar 2018 OP
It's unfortunate that this country doesn't understand SoCalNative Mar 2018 #1
just charge $5 admission for everyone. affordable n easy. nt msongs Mar 2018 #2
Or lower the "suggested amount" to, maybe $10.00 and explain why. 3Hotdogs Mar 2018 #3

SoCalNative

(4,613 posts)
1. It's unfortunate that this country doesn't understand
Thu Mar 1, 2018, 04:42 PM
Mar 2018

that many of the great museums of the world are funded almost entirely by their governments, and as such admission is free or a minimal charge/donation for all patrons.

3Hotdogs

(13,394 posts)
3. Or lower the "suggested amount" to, maybe $10.00 and explain why.
Thu Mar 1, 2018, 08:36 PM
Mar 2018

----- ain't nobody gonna pay $25.00. I bet the policy is changed in two or three months when attendance and income decline.


What da hell. Phantom only cost me $9.00. Same with Wonder Woman and she is hot. Phantom, not so much for me but that's just me.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New York»Prepared for Bumps, the M...