Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
New Jersey
Related: About this forumN.J. woman must remove anti-Biden F-bomb signs or face $250-a-day fines, judge rules
Last edited Sat Jul 17, 2021, 08:46 AM - Edit history (1)
Hat tip, Popehat
Yeah that doesnt sound right, plus the judge is invoking like three speech tropes
Link to tweet
This goes back to Thursday, so it's not LBN.
Union
N.J. woman must remove anti-Biden F-bomb signs or face $250-a-day fines, judge rules
Updated Jul 17, 2021; Posted Jul 16, 2021
By Rebecca Panico | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com
Editors note: This story contains a photo that features profanity.
A municipal judge on Thursday ruled that a Roselle Park homeowners owners anti- President Biden flags including the F-bomb on her fence were obscene and must be removed because they violated a borough ordinance.
Roselle Park Municipal Court Judge Gary Bundy ordered the Willow Avenue homeowner to remove the signs with profanity within a week or face a $250-a-day fine. Patricia Dilascio is the property owner but her daughter, Andrea Dick, had the signs, three of which include the F-word, on display.
This is not a case about politics. It is a case, pure and simple, about language, Bundy said. This ordinance does not restrict political speech. Neither this town or its laws may abridge or eliminate Ms. Dilascios freedom of speech. However, freedom of speech is not simply an absolute right. It is clear from state law and statutes that we cannot simply put up the umbrella of the First Amendment and say everything and anything is protected speech.
{snip}
Roselle Park Mayor Joseph Signorello III, a Democrat who is running for state Senate in Union County, previously said the home is close to a school and angered some residents. But Dick repeatedly said she would not remove the signs since they are political speech protected by the First Amendment.
{snip}
The homeowner has 20 days to appeal the decision to Superior Court. Campagna did not respond to a request for comment and a man who answered the door at the property Friday morning said shes not home.
The three signs with the f-word and others remained up Friday morning.
Local journalism needs your support. Subscribe at nj.com/supporter.
Rebecca Panico may be reached at rpanico@njadvancemedia.com.
N.J. woman must remove anti-Biden F-bomb signs or face $250-a-day fines, judge rules
Updated Jul 17, 2021; Posted Jul 16, 2021
By Rebecca Panico | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com
Editors note: This story contains a photo that features profanity.
A municipal judge on Thursday ruled that a Roselle Park homeowners owners anti- President Biden flags including the F-bomb on her fence were obscene and must be removed because they violated a borough ordinance.
Roselle Park Municipal Court Judge Gary Bundy ordered the Willow Avenue homeowner to remove the signs with profanity within a week or face a $250-a-day fine. Patricia Dilascio is the property owner but her daughter, Andrea Dick, had the signs, three of which include the F-word, on display.
This is not a case about politics. It is a case, pure and simple, about language, Bundy said. This ordinance does not restrict political speech. Neither this town or its laws may abridge or eliminate Ms. Dilascios freedom of speech. However, freedom of speech is not simply an absolute right. It is clear from state law and statutes that we cannot simply put up the umbrella of the First Amendment and say everything and anything is protected speech.
{snip}
Roselle Park Mayor Joseph Signorello III, a Democrat who is running for state Senate in Union County, previously said the home is close to a school and angered some residents. But Dick repeatedly said she would not remove the signs since they are political speech protected by the First Amendment.
{snip}
The homeowner has 20 days to appeal the decision to Superior Court. Campagna did not respond to a request for comment and a man who answered the door at the property Friday morning said shes not home.
The three signs with the f-word and others remained up Friday morning.
Local journalism needs your support. Subscribe at nj.com/supporter.
Rebecca Panico may be reached at rpanico@njadvancemedia.com.
Andrea Dick is right. The signs are political speech protected by the First Amendment.
Go ahead and alert. Then give this some thought:
Source: https://blog.library.gsu.edu/2012/03/23/secularists-descend-upon-d-c-for-reason-rally/
Fri Jan 25, 2019: Johns Hopkins to buy Newseum building in D.C. as journalism museum plans to relocate
{edited to add this full disclosure:} IANAL
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
N.J. woman must remove anti-Biden F-bomb signs or face $250-a-day fines, judge rules (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2021
OP
I tried to post the picture, but it's in one of those formats that wouldn't show up at DU.
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2021
#4
AND she's in a school zone. I know it's 2021 but kids don't need to see that.
CurtEastPoint
Jul 2021
#7
The First Amendment doesn't protect "fighting" words. "Absolute free speechers" aren't ...
marble falls
Jul 2021
#5
If you are on Facebook, take a look at her vitriol. Hate filled, illiterate crap.
CurtEastPoint
Jul 2021
#8
CurtEastPoint
(19,312 posts)1. Perfect name for her daughter: Mrs. Dick.
mahatmakanejeeves
(62,397 posts)2. Here's the earlier thread in LBN about this issue:
madaboutharry
(41,483 posts)3. I agree with Bundy.
The ordinance prohibits displaying any obscene material, communication or performance or other article or item which is obscene within the Borough. It defines obscenity as material that depicts or describes sexual conduct or lacks any serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.
Her signs, which can be seen at the link, are not in any way serious. Their only value is broadcasting to the world how she possesses no class whatsoever.
mahatmakanejeeves
(62,397 posts)4. I tried to post the picture, but it's in one of those formats that wouldn't show up at DU.
You can kinda guess what they say.
Thank you for writing.
And good morning.
CurtEastPoint
(19,312 posts)6. here
mahatmakanejeeves
(62,397 posts)9. Thanks. Just what I need at 8:00 on a Saturday morning.
And good morning. We're already off to a great start.
CurtEastPoint
(19,312 posts)7. AND she's in a school zone. I know it's 2021 but kids don't need to see that.
marble falls
(62,803 posts)5. The First Amendment doesn't protect "fighting" words. "Absolute free speechers" aren't ...
... following the Constitution, either.
CurtEastPoint
(19,312 posts)8. If you are on Facebook, take a look at her vitriol. Hate filled, illiterate crap.
mahatmakanejeeves
(62,397 posts)10. From the thread at Popehat:
Lawyersplaining Jersey Justice. Municipal judges are appointed by the municipality and are part time. They preside over traffic court and misdemeanors. The appointment is a 3 year term. Not surprised a municipal judge upheld an unconstitutional as applied ordinance .
Link to tweet
3Hotdogs
(13,767 posts)11. Yuppers. If he wants to be reappointed, guess which way he has to rule. Then the taxpayers pay to
defend his ruling in superior court or higher.