Minnesota GOP claims election 'abnormalities' without evidence

[mysteryowl]

Election officials on Friday swiftly rejected claims by Minnesota Republican Party Chairwoman Jennifer Carnahan that "extreme data abnormalities" might have influenced the state's Nov. 3 election after her examples proved to be nothing more than instances of high voter turnout.

"The bottom line is you can't just throw out conjecture and guesswork without real evidence," said Risikat Adesaogun, spokeswoman for the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. It was "hard to respond to allegations that are so vague and unformed."

https://www.startribune.com/minnesota-gop-claims-election-abnormalities-without-evidence/573145901/

Look at what that fool has started!

[IllinoisBirdWatcher]

1. Maybe they are using Michigan data. Could have been a trade-off. N/T

[Lokee11]

4. +1

First thing I thought when I read this too

FDT!

[PJMcK]

5. Good one! (n/t)

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

2. Biden beat Trump by 233K votes in MN, so there's no chance

of changing the result. But that's not really the point, is it? They're just throwing more shit at the wall.

[mysteryowl]

3. Yep, that seems to be the trend here.

80 million people believe this kind of propaganda. What is the matter with these people?!

[Blue Owl]

6. Hey Jennifer Carnahan, tell us how tRump's gold toilet tastes

Surely you must know after licking it so tenderly and lovingly

[geardaddy]

9. And she's married to that creep Hagedorn.

[dflprincess]

7. The only "irregulatities" in Minnesota I can think of

are the GOP apparently paying people run as third party candidates to siphon votes from the Democrats.

Maybe Jenny would support a deep dive in what went on in the 1st District Congressional race.

[abqtommy]

8. Yeah, to the reTHUGS it's an abnormality when they lose in spite of all their ratfucking.