Minnesota
Related: About this forumMedical device firms spent millions to get the device tax to go away
In case you've missed this. Not only "my" Republican member of the house, but "my" two Democratic Senators voted to repeal an important part of the ACA.
http://www.startribune.com/medical-device-firms-spent-millions-to-get-the-device-tax-to-go-away/364031911/
WASHINGTON It took tens of millions of dollars in lobbying and campaign contributions, but in the end, Minnesota's medical device companies got what they wanted out of Congress: the gutting of a sales tax they claimed was crippling them.
In the waning days before the Christmas recess, both chambers of Congress passed a two-year suspension of the 2.3 percent excise tax without finding a replacement for the lost revenue a decision that would add roughly $29 billion to the national debt over 10 years if the suspension eventually leads to the tax's permanent repeal.
(snip)
Republican Rep. Erik Paulsen has successfully passed seven House bills since 2012 to get the excise tax repealed. He also consistently led the pack in the House and Senate for campaign contributions from the medical device industry, pulling in $97,000.
In the upper chamber, Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken worked on it, too. Klobuchar has been fighting the tax from the beginning. In 2012, her most recent election cycle, she received $90,000 in campaign contributions from the industry. When he was up for re-election in 2014, Franken received $55,000 from the medical device industry, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research group based in Washington, D.C.
The companies, and the politicians supporting a repeal, complained the tax was crippling a budding industry. They blamed it for lackluster growth; many politicians, including Paulsen, called it a "job killer." That rhetoric, though, isn't in line with three reviews of the medical device industry over the past couple of years. Those studies found that massive job losses weren't necessarily a result of the tax, in part because companies could pass higher costs along to consumers by increasing prices.
What is clear is that the tax's suspension was a windfall for device companies, especially the big ones. Medtronic paid about $135 million in excise taxes in fiscal year 2015.
(snip)
Craig Holman, who works for the government watchdog group Public Citizen, calls this pay-to-play effort on Capitol Hill heavily influential in how politicians operate.
"Obamacare needs that tax in order to survive.
The mere fact that you've got liberal Democrats in Minnesota undermining the financing of Obamacare really shows how much influence campaign contributions can have," he said.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)companies in her state.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)And yes they do contribute big to the Northern Suburban Economy,but,they can handle any type of surtax that comes their way. All you have to think about is how much do those Fibulators or what they charge for a Pace Maker,they are not cheap and they know it. Most Insurance will pay the freight on these devices and we wonder why this American Insurance think is such a joke. Once we see single payer,this crap will stop.
exboyfil
(18,008 posts)but no special tax on goods from China and other countries that are kicking our heads in with the trade deficit?
The tax makes absolutely no sense.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)devices both domestic and foreign.
dflprincess
(28,492 posts)The want to use the infrastructure here, but they don't want to help pay for it.
exboyfil
(18,008 posts)Robert Reich had a good write up regarding Pfizer and how you can start taking benefits away from companies that do not pay corporate taxes.
How we tax corporations and individual's dividend/capital gains needs to be rethought I think. At the end of the day we offer blanket protection for all companies through our DoD. The Irish spend 1/7th of the amount the U.S. pays on a GDP basis for defense.
glinda
(14,807 posts)implant those devices in their chests. Assholes. Some dogs were rescued in a silent agreement because Medtronic does not play by the rules in regards to testing and what they do on animals.