Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Minnesota
Related: About this forumDespite years of denial, Minneapolis police used secretive process for serious misconduct
https://www.startribune.com/despite-years-of-denial-minneapolis-police-used-secretive-process-for-serious-misconduct/600369519/Minneapolis police leaders used a secretive process to handle serious officer misconduct cases while keeping the details confidential, despite repeated claims to the contrary.
In public meetings and statements to media, police and city officials long claimed they use coaching, a form of one-on-one mentoring, only in response to the lowest-level policy violations, like uniform infractions or not wearing a seatbelt. But new court documents reveal that some of the misconduct quietly coached in recent years is more severe.
In public meetings and statements to media, police and city officials long claimed they use coaching, a form of one-on-one mentoring, only in response to the lowest-level policy violations, like uniform infractions or not wearing a seatbelt. But new court documents reveal that some of the misconduct quietly coached in recent years is more severe.
Some of the misconduct included mishandling their weapons (including firing a round into the wall of a precinct), failure to report use of force that injured someone in custody, and letting a police dog off the least, resulting in it attacking a civilian. (That cop got a promotion.)
Because of the coaching, these misconduct records were not public.
Last year, in charging Minneapolis with a pattern of discriminatory policing, the U.S. Department of Justice criticized coaching as part of the city's "fundamentally flawed" accountability system. Only one in four cases referred for coaching through a city oversight office ended up being coached, the charges say, and some allegations were "far from 'low-level,'" including an officer who "smacked, kicked, and used a taser on a teen accused of shoplifting."
The new court filings, made public as part of a government watchdog's lawsuit, offer the fullest window yet into the police department's convoluted coaching process. The records include nine examples of MPD using coaching to handle more serious misconduct than what the city officials have publicly claimed. They also show how city leaders have misrepresented this process in public meetings in the wake of George Floyd's murder, even as they sought to mend fractured trust.
The new court filings, made public as part of a government watchdog's lawsuit, offer the fullest window yet into the police department's convoluted coaching process. The records include nine examples of MPD using coaching to handle more serious misconduct than what the city officials have publicly claimed. They also show how city leaders have misrepresented this process in public meetings in the wake of George Floyd's murder, even as they sought to mend fractured trust.
This is what reform looks like. Going in circles.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 543 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Despite years of denial, Minneapolis police used secretive process for serious misconduct (Original Post)
WhiskeyGrinder
May 2024
OP
LiberalFighter
(53,487 posts)1. There needs to be a federal national database
Tracking police misconduct and procedures.
AND federal funds based on it.
SamKnause
(13,831 posts)2. There will be no reforming the cops in the U.S..
The supremes don't want reform.
The Congress does not want reform.
They have given cops over reaching powers and they will not rescind them.