Good rebuttal to Liz Collin's "The Fall of Minneapolis" in the Minnesota Reformer
I notice that right wingers love to reference this as the "real truth" about George Floyd. The article is fairly long and the clip below doesn't do it justice. It is worth the read.
https://minnesotareformer.com/2024/01/11/i-watched-the-fall-of-minneapolis-so-you-dont-have-to/
I watched The Fall of Minneapolis so you dont have to
Liz Collin advertises bombshells, but serves up a cherry-picked rehashing of previous reporting
by Deena Winter
Alpha News Reporter Liz Collin, in her documentary The Fall of Minneapolis, pretends that these complicating factors about Floyds murder never came up at trial and werent reported by the hundreds of journalists who covered the case.
Collins claim serves two self-serving purposes: It inflates the value of the supposed bombshells of her documentary, and makes the rest of the media complicit in an alleged conspiracy to cover up the real story of Floyds death.
Just one problem: Shes wrong.
I covered the case and the trial from beginning to end. From a huge press room set up across the street from the courthouse, about 40 reporters from around the world watched the trial on giant screens, with just two reporters allowed in the actual courtroom per day. (I do not recall seeing Collin there.)
Collin uses various scenes to soil the dead mans reputation. He denied being on drugs, even though he clearly was on drugs. In his drug-addled state, he seemed to indicate hed previously been shot by police (theres no evidence he was), and he said I cant breathe before he was even on the ground, saying he was claustrophobic.