Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Michigan
Related: About this forumDTE's Fermi 2 nuclear power plant shut down after leak detected
(Detroit Metro Times) DTE Energy shut down its Fermi 2 nuclear plant in Monroe County on Sunday after a leak was detected in the drywell area that surrounds the reactor about 30 miles south of Detroit.
The public is not in danger, and the plant is in safe, stable condition, DTE spokesman Stephen R. Tait tells Metro Times.
The plant will remain shut down until repairs are complete.
At 4 p.m. Saturday, a sensor detected the leakage of reactor coolant, according to a notice filed by DTE Energy with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The utility notified NRC at 6:30 p.m. ..............(more)
https://www.metrotimes.com/news/dtes-fermi-2-nuclear-power-plant-shut-down-after-leak-detected-33943675
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1192 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DTE's Fermi 2 nuclear power plant shut down after leak detected (Original Post)
marmar
Aug 2023
OP
RandySF
(70,644 posts)1. I'm still open to nuclear to get us off of coal.
Theres no free lunch.
yourout
(8,074 posts)2. Agree with a few caveats...
Absolutely no high pressure primary cooling that can go airborne which means either molten salt reactors or some other low pressure non-erosolizable media.
IbogaProject
(3,655 posts)3. Big issue is the waste
And finding solutions to store it safely for tens of thousands of years. Steel doesn't last for millennia. It is a great baseline power source but the choice of Uranium instead of what the actual designers of the A-Bomb recommended which was Thorium. Only those involved with weapons production liked the Uranium reactor concept.
BlueIn_W_Pa
(842 posts)4. There are reactors that will eat old waste, though
But technological breakthroughs can transform a sluggish sector into a futuristic game-changer. Case in point: GE Hitachis Advanced Recycling Center, (ARC). The ARC technology is basically the anti-nuke: it actually burns nuclear waste (even weapons-grade plutonium), and emits exactly zero CO2.
Heres the secret: The system uses a liquid metal sodium to control the nuclear reaction, instead of high-pressure water. The sodium-cooling allows the reactor to burn the leftover energy in its used fuel nuclear waste that, in traditional water-cooled reactors, would be taken and stored for thousands of years. In fact, when used fuel is removed from a traditional water-cooled reactor, 95 percent of its potential energy is still untapped.
Heres a breakdown of ARCs benefits:
Burns more of its own raw radioactive fuel
Burns other reactors spent fuel
Shuts down automatically if theres a problem
Is built in small modules than can be expanded
The waste it does generate needs to be stored for just a few hundred years.
Heres the secret: The system uses a liquid metal sodium to control the nuclear reaction, instead of high-pressure water. The sodium-cooling allows the reactor to burn the leftover energy in its used fuel nuclear waste that, in traditional water-cooled reactors, would be taken and stored for thousands of years. In fact, when used fuel is removed from a traditional water-cooled reactor, 95 percent of its potential energy is still untapped.
Heres a breakdown of ARCs benefits:
Burns more of its own raw radioactive fuel
Burns other reactors spent fuel
Shuts down automatically if theres a problem
Is built in small modules than can be expanded
The waste it does generate needs to be stored for just a few hundred years.
https://www.reliableplant.com/Read/27032/GE-nuclear-reactor-waste