Massachusetts
Related: About this forumConservative 'election integrity' group wants to publish Mass. voter data online. They're suing the state to get it.
A group with conservative ties seeking to obtain voter records nationwide is suing Secretary of State Bill Galvin for not providing access to Massachusetts voters information.
The Voter Reference Foundation, an organization that has for years compiled and published online a public database of state voter rolls, filed a lawsuit against Galvin in federal court Wednesday. The group alleged that he, as the states chief elections officer, had violated the National Voter Registration Acts public disclosure provision by not granting them access to the states voter rolls.
The Ohio-based group is a subsidiary of Restoration of America, an organization backed by GOP megadonor Richard Uihlein, who has for years funneled money toward candidates who questioned President Bidens 2020 election win, along with other efforts investigating disproven instances of so-called election fraud. The Voter Reference Foundation argues it is seeking to ensure transparent, accurate and fair elections, in part by making voter information accessible to the public.
Their efforts come as elections officials nationwide say they have seen an uptick in conservative-backed attempts to obtain voter information, especially since the 2020 election. After losing to Biden that year, former president Donald Trump claimed the election was stolen from him, prompting a wave of unsubstantiated claims challenging election integrity especially in battleground states. Voting rights advocates have expressed concerns that those lists could be used by malicious actors to challenge the 2024 election results or intimidate voters who may not want their information published online.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/10/10/metro/massachusetts-sues-secretary-of-state-galvin-election-integrity-voter-data/
msongs
(70,170 posts)Back in the day, one could buy a voter list in Michigan. I assume you still can.
Lovie777
(14,993 posts)and personally, bring it on.
Lonestarblue
(11,807 posts)questionseverything
(10,136 posts)Actually I think if a citizen can buy the list ( its public record) it should just be published on line
TommyT139
(697 posts)that will make it far easier to harass voters -- by anyone anywhere. Of course that can be done now, but at least having to get current lists request by request is a speed bump of sorts.
questionseverything
(10,136 posts)TommyT139
(697 posts)But I have no problems with slowing down scammers. Everything doesn't need to be instantly available online.