Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheCowsCameHome

(40,216 posts)
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 04:29 PM Feb 2012

Why does Scott Brown need signatures to get on the ballot?

There have been campaigners hanging out at the local Stop & Shop gathering signatures to get Scott Brown on the fall ballot. Isn't being an incumbent sufficient?

Anyway, I brushed them off and told them I thought his alliance with Roy Blunt was reprehensible and that he could kiss female voters goodbye.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
1. As the republican nominee for the Senate race, he shouldn't need signatures to be on the ballot.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 04:42 PM
Feb 2012

As I understand it, tea party people are trying to get some Senate legislation introduced, and if they get enough signatures, they're going to give it to Brown and ask that he propose it.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
4. I was under the impression he already submitted them a few weeks ago.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 05:22 PM
Feb 2012

I assumed he wasn't still collecting them. You are correct, though, and rereading my post I can see where I went wrong.

I had intended to say that I didn't think he needed any more signatures since I thought he had already gotten the necessary ones. I also thought, (wrongly) that he was the repuke nominee, but I guess that's not decided yet either, though he is currently running unopposed the last I heard. I'll admit I haven't kept up on the Scott Brown goings on.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
5. Maybe some of the signatures were invalidated?
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 05:28 PM
Feb 2012

Too many Porky Frigging Pig signatures, mayhaps?

I dunno--I don't follow Scottie or his truck or his little barn coat. I'm focused on getting EW in that seat!

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
6. It could be,
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 05:30 PM
Feb 2012

I didn't think he had needed any more, though I just googled quickly and can't see that he's done the initial turn in either. Some grumblings about a teabagger candidate running against him in a primary as well, but no one's declared yet.

 

MarkCharles

(2,261 posts)
10. Yup, even Kennedy needed them back in his last..
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 09:35 AM
Feb 2012

election.

That's part of Mass law governing elections.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. Nope. If you want on the ballot, you have to prove that people want you there.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 05:05 PM
Feb 2012

I'd sign Porky Frigging Pig if I signed at all!

Seriously, though--you did the right thing!

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
8. And that is the way it should be for every election.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 06:13 PM
Feb 2012

Using a back room committee of party insiders to select who is running for whatever office sucks bowling balls.

Let the people decide who they want running.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»Why does Scott Brown need...