Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(117,207 posts)
Fri Oct 12, 2018, 11:02 PM Oct 2018

Charlie Baker opposes nurse staffing mandates on November ballot

BOSTON — Republican Gov. Charlie Baker says a recent analysis by an independent state agency has convinced him to vote against a proposal that would require strict nurse-to-patient ratios in Massachusetts hospitals.

The study by the Health Policy Commission estimated the cost of implementing Question 1 on the November ballot — should voters approve it — at between $676 million and $949 million.

In announcing Wednesday that he opposes the question, Baker cited those cost estimates along with concerns the proposed law would disproportionately impact smaller, community hospitals around the state.

The governor said he was also surprised to learn that nurse-to-patient ratios in Massachusetts were already above those in California, the only U.S. state with mandated staffing levels.

Read more: http://www.bostonherald.com/news/local_politics/2018/10/charlie_baker_opposes_nurse_staffing_mandates_on_nov_ballot

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charlie Baker opposes nurse staffing mandates on November ballot (Original Post) TexasTowelie Oct 2018 OP
Of course he would. smirkymonkey Oct 2018 #1
I'm so excited to vote tomorrow! Croney Oct 2018 #2
Most of the liberal politicians in the state are voting yes. smirkymonkey Oct 2018 #3

Croney

(4,925 posts)
2. I'm so excited to vote tomorrow!
Sun Oct 21, 2018, 05:29 PM
Oct 2018

Regarding question 1, I'm voting yes because a nurse/family member said it's the right vote, but I see so many vote-no ads that I wonder if it will pass. Big money on the no-side.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
3. Most of the liberal politicians in the state are voting yes.
Sun Oct 21, 2018, 06:55 PM
Oct 2018

I have looked into this and I am convinced that the no side is all about corporate profit and greed. I am siding with the nurses!

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»Charlie Baker opposes nur...