Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 06:25 AM Mar 2014

‘Peeping Toms are jumping for joy’: Upskirt pics are legal, Massachusetts’ top court rules

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/05/peeping-toms-are-jumping-for-joy-upskirt-pics-are-legal-massachusetts-top-court-rules/



‘Peeping Toms are jumping for joy’: Upskirt pics are legal, Massachusetts’ top court rules
By Reuters
Wednesday, March 5, 2014 15:55 EST

BOSTON (Reuters) – A man who snapped secret pictures up women’s skirts on a Boston subway train – a practice known as upskirting – did not violate the state’s Peeping Tom law, Massachusetts’ top court said on Wednesday, pointing to a loophole in current legislation.

Massachusetts law prohibits secretly filming or photographing a person who is nude or partly nude, but that does not apply to people who are fully clothed, according to a Supreme Judicial Court decision written by Justice Margot Botsford.

The ruling comes in the case of a man who was arrested by transit police in 2010 for using his cell phone to take pictures and video up women’s’ skirts on the subway and who fought to have the charges of voyeurism dismissed.

The law “does not apply to photographing… persons who are fully clothed and, in particular, does not reach the type of upskirting that the defendant is charged with attempting to accomplish on the MBTA,” it said.


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
‘Peeping Toms are jumping for joy’: Upskirt pics are legal, Massachusetts’ top court rules (Original Post) unhappycamper Mar 2014 OP
This will need to be addressed, legislatively, ASAP. MADem Mar 2014 #1
LOL. And my first thought was..... wandy Mar 2014 #2
If that's a kilt newfie11 Mar 2014 #3
Far be it for me to give advice. But.......... wandy Mar 2014 #4
Lol your probably right newfie11 Mar 2014 #5
Although... pipi_k Mar 2014 #7
Lol that was a hoot!! newfie11 Mar 2014 #8
Not any more!! polmaven Mar 2014 #6

wandy

(3,539 posts)
2. LOL. And my first thought was.....
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 06:57 AM
Mar 2014

Thats a Kilt!
Those legs are photo-shopped.
Scan that pix up any further and you'll be finding a bagpipe and a fine Scottish beard.
And just what a man who was so low as to snap secret pictures up women’s skirts would deserve!

polmaven

(9,463 posts)
6. Not any more!!
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 09:50 AM
Mar 2014

The MA legislature worked quickly!! Fastest I can remember! The bill closing that loophole is on the Governor's desk, and he is expected to sign it into law this morning!!

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»‘Peeping Toms are jumping...