June 29: "The protesters keep coming and keep getting louder" outside Brett Kavanaugh

[mahatmakanejeeves]

Earlier today: “The protesters keep coming and keep getting louder” outside Brett Kavanaugh’s home “No privacy for us, no peace for you!”
#AbortionIsHealthcare
@OurRightsDC

@ShutDown_DC

@downrightimp

@WeActRadio

https://dcmediagroup.us/2022/06/06/abortion-rights-activists-build-movement-homes-right-wing-supreme-court-justices/

Link to tweet

[Diamond_Dog]

1. Awesome

Never stop!

[calimary]

2. Wish I could join them!

“No privacy for us? NO peace for YOU.”

And no privacy either.

[Chainfire]

3. They are trying to tell you something, asshole!

It is called "freedom of speech." The right to tell your government officials that they are dipshits. He really ought to check out that Constitution, no matter what else he might find there.

[TheRealNorth]

4. I don't care for the tactic....

But Republicans are okay with driving their semis and trucks at slow speeds while blowing their horns, and they had no problem with armed people "protesting" outside abortion doctors homes, public health officials' homes during COVID lockdowns, and the harassment of election workers at home.

So, I won't cry for the Republicans on the Supreme Court who are crying out for protections that they don't think others should have.

[mopinko]

6. they deserve no less than what a woman going into a planned parenthood gets.

all day, every day, just like every f'ing clinic in this country.

file under- can dish it out but cant take it.

[The Magistrate]

11. Hear Hear, Ma'am

Merely the 'golden rule' in action.

It's impossible to avoid compliance. How you treat others is your instruction to others for how you should be treated yourself. You can only hope they will be kind and courteous enough to do to as you would be done by, whatever their personal inclination. I would not be inclined to march and shout outside someone's domicile, but since the person inside has made clear he wants to be accosted and harangued on the sidewalk, having sicced that experience on others, I am willing to see his wish granted.


"Citizens have the right to exercise 1st and 2nd Amendment rights under the Constitution."

[llashram]

5. great

wish I had one of these RW terrorists called an SC justice living near me. I would be outside, either alone or not. Just give me the megaphone...

[sheshe2]

7. FU!

What is he going to do, start crying again?

[Jilly_in_VA]

8. Drink a little more beer, boy

Pretty soon you won't hear them at all.

[MichMan]

9. People have the right to stand in a public area and scream whatever they like

If the neighbors or other residents don't like it they can move. Their rights don't usurp those of the protesters

[eppur_se_muova]

10. Good. nt

[kacekwl]

12. Thank you all who take

the time to protest. I wish I were there.

[LetMyPeopleVote]

13. Cowardly SCOTUS asked governors to quell non-violent protests

If it is okay to picket the home of doctors proving abortions and at abortion clinics, it is okay to protest non-violently in front of the homes of these partisan hacks

Link to tweet

https://www.msnbc.com/the-reidout/reidout-blog/supreme-court-objects-peaceful-protests-slashing-abortion-rights-rcna36691

Protesters have been gathering outside the homes of all six conservative Supreme Court justices in recent weeks. Now, in a remarkable act of cowardice, the court is asking officials to quell the demonstrations, claiming they are violating state and county protesting laws. The requests are the latest attempts to coddle a deeply unpopular court and insulate its conservative members from outrage over their anti-democratic decisions.

Supreme Court marshal Gail Curley last week sent letters to Maryland and Virginia’s governors, both Republicans, and to the Democratic county leaders in Maryland’s Montgomery County and Virginia’s Fairfax County, asking them to put an end to the demonstrations, NBC News reported. Some conservative politicians have equated the protests to the deadly Capitol insurrection. In May, lawmakers responded by passing a bill giving judges’ families increased security.

“For weeks on end, large groups of protesters chanting slogans, using bullhorns, and banging drums have picketed Justices’ homes in Maryland,” Curley wrote in her letter to Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan. She advised him to put the protest down by enforcing a state law banning people from disrupting someone else’s “tranquility,” and she described loud protests as “exactly the kind of conduct that Maryland and Montgomery County laws prohibit.” She sent a similar letter to Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin.

This wave of protests first erupted in May, when someone leaked a draft of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling overturning federal abortion rights. Hogan and Youngkin, who both oppose abortion, have pushed federal officials to interpret obscure protest laws as bans on demonstrations outside justices’ homes. But Hogan’s communications director acknowledged in a tweet Saturday that both federal and local officials have said they don’t have grounds to apply the law to non-violent protests.

These assholes are all partisan hacks and it is appropriate to protest these partisan hacks