Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Maine
Related: About this forumMaine child care workers to face background checks, fingerprints
Lawmakers override Gov. LePage's veto of the bill ...AUGUSTA Thousands of child care workers in Maine will now have to undergo criminal background checks and fingerprinting under a new law.
The law requires employees of child care agencies to undergo background checks and fingerprints. The state estimates 5,000 background checks in the laws first year, and then 2,000 annually after that.
The state will reimburse agencies for the cost of the background checks and processing.
Lawmakers overrode Republican Gov. Paul LePages veto of the law Monday. The governor called the bill bureaucratic, over-regulation.
Lawmakers have approved funding the law with about $660,000 in federal funds and nearly $400,000 in state special revenue funds.
The law wont go into effect until 90 days after the Legislatures ongoing special session officially adjourns.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1116 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maine child care workers to face background checks, fingerprints (Original Post)
left-of-center2012
Jul 2018
OP
RockRaven
(16,283 posts)1. Are they trying to catch child abusers, or some other segment of society?
I assume since LePage vetoed it that the bill wasn't trying to catch illegal immigrants.
But what I don't know is whether the law is aimed at kid-f*ckers, child-beaters, fraudsters, civil rights abusers, insane persons, or yet something else. He could have been trying to protect any or all of those... out of self-interest perhaps.
Squinch
(52,748 posts)2. This is fairly standard practice in most other states. And good
practice.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)3. "fairly standard practice"
I think California began this about 20 years ago when I was living there.
It should be required everywhere.