Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Illinois
Related: About this forumIllinois Justices Overturn State's Landmark 2013 Pension Law
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/illinois-justices-overturn-states-landmark-2013-pension-law-30903932The Illinois Supreme Court forced the state Friday to find another way to fix the nation's worst government-employee pension crisis, ruling lawmakers "overstepped" by enacting a law that slashed retirement benefits to confront a massive budget deficit.
In a unanimous decision that frequently scolded state policymakers, the seven justices declared that the measure former Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn signed into law 18 months ago violates the state constitution because it would leave pension promises "diminished or impaired."
snip
Most states faced the same public employee pension crisis, exacerbated by the Great Recession, and took steps to remedy the problem. However, Illinois balked until Quinn and Democratic lawmakers finally overcame opposition from union allies and struck the deal, amid warnings that it might not survive a court challenge.
The Illinois justices ruled the law represented not the last resort, but "an expedient to break a political stalemate."
Although the decision provides no blueprint for what should be done next, the court said there were other options on the table for dealing with the economic crisis including raising taxes. The temporary income tax surcharge Quinn implemented in 2011 was allowed to roll back in January, after voters elected Rauner, who campaigned against it.
snip
Against withering questioning by the Supreme Court in March, state lawyers in court had to defend decades of skipped pension contributions by the state which largely created the disaster. They attempted to end-run constitutional concerns by invoking "police powers" in times of crisis. The court scoffed, saying such measures were reserved for true, public-safety-threat situations.
In a unanimous decision that frequently scolded state policymakers, the seven justices declared that the measure former Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn signed into law 18 months ago violates the state constitution because it would leave pension promises "diminished or impaired."
snip
Most states faced the same public employee pension crisis, exacerbated by the Great Recession, and took steps to remedy the problem. However, Illinois balked until Quinn and Democratic lawmakers finally overcame opposition from union allies and struck the deal, amid warnings that it might not survive a court challenge.
The Illinois justices ruled the law represented not the last resort, but "an expedient to break a political stalemate."
Although the decision provides no blueprint for what should be done next, the court said there were other options on the table for dealing with the economic crisis including raising taxes. The temporary income tax surcharge Quinn implemented in 2011 was allowed to roll back in January, after voters elected Rauner, who campaigned against it.
snip
Against withering questioning by the Supreme Court in March, state lawyers in court had to defend decades of skipped pension contributions by the state which largely created the disaster. They attempted to end-run constitutional concerns by invoking "police powers" in times of crisis. The court scoffed, saying such measures were reserved for true, public-safety-threat situations.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1899 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Illinois Justices Overturn State's Landmark 2013 Pension Law (Original Post)
Gidney N Cloyd
May 2015
OP
Glad it was 7-0. Lawmakers needed this to force their hands on smarter ways to handle the problem.
Gidney N Cloyd
May 2015
#2
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)1. pretty much a clear case. The original law said
you could never decrease the bennies to someone who was entitled to or receiving them.
The Court acted properly.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)2. Glad it was 7-0. Lawmakers needed this to force their hands on smarter ways to handle the problem.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)3. Good. Taking away benefits that were promised is not the solution.
The state caused this mess. State lawmakers need to come up with a solution that honors the state's obligations.