Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Florida
Related: About this forumAbortion Clinics Filed a Brief to Florida's High Court, Says Privacy Clause Protects Abortion Rights
Previous Post: Petitioner's Initial Brief | Clinics appeal to Florida Supreme Court's conservative bent in fighting abortion ban
Previous Post: State's Answer Brief | Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody says abortion precedents are 'clearly erroneous'
----------
Petitioner's Reply Brief - filed on April 28, 2023
Health News Florida
With the future of abortion rights in Florida potentially hinging on the case, attorneys for abortion clinics and a doctor are pushing back against arguments that the state Supreme Court should reject decades of legal precedents about a privacy clause in the Florida Constitution.
The attorneys late Friday filed a 24-page brief urging the Supreme Court to block a 2022 state law that prevented abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. But the stakes of the case soared last month when Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a new law that would bar abortions after six weeks.
The six-week limit is contingent on the outcome of the challenge to the 15-week law (HB 5). In the 15-week case, the state contends the Supreme Court should reject more than 30 years of legal precedents and rule that a privacy clause in the Constitution does not protect abortion rights.
The plaintiffs attorneys in Fridays brief wrote that the Supreme Court should stick with the longstanding interpretation that the Constitution protects abortion rights, saying the 15-week limit openly flouts that protection and decades of this (Supreme) Courts precedents.
The attorneys late Friday filed a 24-page brief urging the Supreme Court to block a 2022 state law that prevented abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. But the stakes of the case soared last month when Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a new law that would bar abortions after six weeks.
The six-week limit is contingent on the outcome of the challenge to the 15-week law (HB 5). In the 15-week case, the state contends the Supreme Court should reject more than 30 years of legal precedents and rule that a privacy clause in the Constitution does not protect abortion rights.
The plaintiffs attorneys in Fridays brief wrote that the Supreme Court should stick with the longstanding interpretation that the Constitution protects abortion rights, saying the 15-week limit openly flouts that protection and decades of this (Supreme) Courts precedents.
In a March 29 brief, Attorney General Ashley Moodys office argued that past rulings on abortion rights were clearly erroneous and that decisions about abortion restrictions should be left to the Legislature.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 923 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Abortion Clinics Filed a Brief to Florida's High Court, Says Privacy Clause Protects Abortion Rights (Original Post)
In It to Win It
May 2023
OP
LetMyPeopleVote
(154,492 posts)1. South Florida synagogue sues over Florida's new 15-week abortion ban
Here is another lawsuit that I have been following based on the establishment clause of the First Amendment. Jewish law is clear. The life of the mother always comes first
Link to tweet
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article262496912.html
A South Florida Jewish congregation has challenged a new state law that blocks abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, contending the measure violates privacy and religious-freedom rights.
The lawsuit, filed Friday in Leon County circuit court by Congregation LDor Va-Dor, seeks to block the law from taking effect July 1. Abortion clinics also filed a lawsuit this month in Leon County challenging the constitutionality of the restriction.
Both cases include allegations that the law, signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis in April, violates a privacy right in the Florida Constitution that has long played a pivotal role in abortion cases in the state.
But the lawsuit filed Friday by the Boynton Beach congregation also contends that the law violates religious-freedom rights.
For Jews, all life is precious and thus the decision to bring new life into the world is not taken lightly or determined by state fiat, the lawsuit said. In Jewish law, abortion is required if necessary to protect the health, mental or physical well-being of the woman, or for many other reasons not permitted under the act [the new law]. As such, the act prohibits Jewish women from practicing their faith free of government intrusion and thus violates their privacy rights and religious freedom.
The lawsuit, filed Friday in Leon County circuit court by Congregation LDor Va-Dor, seeks to block the law from taking effect July 1. Abortion clinics also filed a lawsuit this month in Leon County challenging the constitutionality of the restriction.
Both cases include allegations that the law, signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis in April, violates a privacy right in the Florida Constitution that has long played a pivotal role in abortion cases in the state.
But the lawsuit filed Friday by the Boynton Beach congregation also contends that the law violates religious-freedom rights.
For Jews, all life is precious and thus the decision to bring new life into the world is not taken lightly or determined by state fiat, the lawsuit said. In Jewish law, abortion is required if necessary to protect the health, mental or physical well-being of the woman, or for many other reasons not permitted under the act [the new law]. As such, the act prohibits Jewish women from practicing their faith free of government intrusion and thus violates their privacy rights and religious freedom.