Uber ballot initiative sparks showdown with lawyers, doctors

[RandySF]

In November, California voters may have to referee a multimillion-dollar battle among Uber, attorneys and doctors. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for anybody who uses the state’s roads and highways.

Uber last fall filed a proposed ballot measure that would cap personal injury lawyers’ contingency fees and limit medical damages for all vehicle crashes in California, even those not involving an Uber. The company paints its effort as a way to rein in attorneys who take advantage of those who get hurt in a crash. Crash survivors often hire attorneys on a contingency basis, meaning the lawyers only get paid if they win the case.

That got attorney groups fired up: They responded by proposing three ballot initiatives that would expand the ride-hailing giant’s liability for passenger injuries; increase its liability for sexual misconduct against riders or drivers; and ban new state laws that interfere with people’s ability to retain lawyers.

Doctors and other medical providers also got organized and formed a political action committee, Providers for Patient Care, last October to oppose Uber’s initiative.



https://calmatters.org/economy/2026/02/uber-california-ballot-initiatives/

[quaint]

1. Latest Uber & Lyft Rideshare Lawsuit Updates

ConsumerNotice.org

As of February 2026, there were 3,188 pending Uber sexual assault lawsuits in federal court claiming “Uber failed to implement appropriate safety precautions to protect passengers, and that plaintiffs suffered sexual assault or harassment as a result.”

Uber cases have also been coordinated in California’s District Courts.

In February 2026, a huge win was recorded for people who have filed lawsuits. The first federal bellwether trial ended in a loss for Uber, with the company ordered to pay $8.5 million to a woman who claimed she was sexually assaulted by a driver.

That outcome could have a significant impact for the thousands of other lawsuits.