Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California
Related: About this forumMeasure to slow development in Silicon Valley commuter county qualifies for ballot
MercuryNewsSaying that Silicon Valley residents seeking cheaper housing are bringing too much traffic and sprawl, activists in San Benito County, the rural county touching Santa Clara Countys southern edges, have qualified a measure for the November ballot that could dramatically put the brakes on new development there.
The measure, if approved by a majority of San Benito County residents, would ban most new development on land zoned for farming and ranching in the county unless it is approved by voters.
The measure, if approved by a majority of San Benito County residents, would ban most new development on land zoned for farming and ranching in the county unless it is approved by voters.
County supervisors allowed developers to cut down our orchards and build subdivisions to house Silicon Valley workers, the November ballot measure says. For many years, inadequate road impact fees allowed our roads to deteriorate. Our schools are overcrowded and residents feel that the supervisors have not required developers to do enough to support our schools. A majority of San Benito residents live in areas with less than three acres of parks or open space for every 1,000 residents. Many residents now realize that our supervisors cumulative land use decisions are negatively impacting our quality of life. Our peaceful, rural lifestyle is disappearing.
Good luck!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 398 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Measure to slow development in Silicon Valley commuter county qualifies for ballot (Original Post)
quaint
Jun 2024
OP
Auggie
(31,802 posts)1. Additionally, the state mandates housing at the expense of rural charm and agriculture
The Mouth
(3,285 posts)2. We need a lot fewer people in California
Every place is overcrowded.
Not enough water and not enough infrastructure.
CoopersDad
(2,880 posts)3. I live here in Santa Cruz County where housing is ridiculous.
And people need to travel further and further to find affordable homes.
It's not just here, mind you, but it's particularly painful for workers and those at the middle and top don't care to invest in public transit, regional rail transit, or truly affordable housing.
I'm a supporter of Transit Oriented Development and promote 50-100% affordable housing to the exclusion of new high end housing construction. There's no shortage of unaffordable housing so lets give that a rest.