Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usonian

(13,858 posts)
Sat Apr 13, 2024, 12:26 AM Apr 2024

California Supreme Court to review rooftop solar net metering

The state’s highest court granted review to a lawsuit challenging a “regressive” rooftop solar policy called NEM 3.0.

https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/04/11/california-supreme-court-to-review-rooftop-solar-net-metering/

A controversial rooftop solar rulemaking decision has risen to the Supreme Court of California, with the state’s highest court granting review for a petition filed by the Center for Biological Diversity.

The case involves NEM 3.0, a rate structure that went into effect in April 2023. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved a request by the state’s largest investor-owned utilities to cut compensation to customers that export excess solar generation to the grid, a process called net energy metering.

Net metering rates were rapidly cut by 80% under NEM 3.0. This change, combined with a high interest rate environment, has pushed the state’s robust rooftop solar industry off a cliff, damaging the return on investment for homeowners, and leading to more than 17,000 solar jobs lost, demand falling 80% post-implementation, and numerous companies filing for bankruptcy.

“The commission’s new rooftop solar policy enables the utilities’ self-interested attack on rooftop solar,” said Bill Powers, an energy expert with The Protect Our Communities Foundation. “The real problem is heedless pursuit of maximum profit by the utilities at the expense of reasonable rates and commonsense climate action.”


At issue:

did the Commission fail to proceed in the manner required by section 2827.1(b)(3), which mandates that a net energy metering tariff must be ‘based on the costs and benefits of the renewable electrical generation facility?’”

You've got three guesses. Hint:
✅ Yes
✅ Yes
✅ Yes

(IMNSHO)

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Supreme Court to review rooftop solar net metering (Original Post) usonian Apr 2024 OP
Yay! Dem2theMax Apr 2024 #1
A blatant attempt by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Think. Again. Apr 2024 #2
The CPUC always acts as though it is made up of paid off utility lobbyists. TeamProg Apr 2024 #3
But our current assholes on the PUC have all been appointed by either Brown or Newsom The Mouth Apr 2024 #4

Dem2theMax

(10,284 posts)
1. Yay!
Sat Apr 13, 2024, 02:42 AM
Apr 2024

I hope they do right by consumers. I was going to get solar. But after what they allowed the utility companies to do, there was no point.

Why have an EV if you don't have solar?

California has definitely been going backwards when it comes to solar. So I hope they get it right this time.

Think. Again.

(17,996 posts)
2. A blatant attempt by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
Sat Apr 13, 2024, 05:16 AM
Apr 2024

....to make sure the utility companies can rip off home-generated electricity.

 

TeamProg

(6,630 posts)
3. The CPUC always acts as though it is made up of paid off utility lobbyists.
Sat Apr 13, 2024, 10:03 AM
Apr 2024

They have been screwing consumers probably since Reagan was governor.

The Mouth

(3,285 posts)
4. But our current assholes on the PUC have all been appointed by either Brown or Newsom
Sat Apr 13, 2024, 11:41 AM
Apr 2024

California Democratic Party gets a major 'FAIL' on this one. Of course Newsom is a billionaire, so why should he give a dam.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»California Supreme Court ...