Arizona
Related: About this forumIt's past time to take down Tucson's Pancho Villa statue
It's past time to take down Tucson's Pancho Villa statueBy Tom Danehy
Why, then, is there a statue of Pancho Villa smack dab at the entrance to Downtown Tucson...Arizona...USA? Why does this vile swine, who deserves only a gravesite to be pissed upon, instead get a statue? He doesn't deserve one in his own country, let alone in ours. He killed dozens of Americans, calmly and coldly, on more than one occasion. And yet, there it stands, after all these years.
If you asked 100 Tucsonans who (and what) Pancho Villa was, those who would claim that he was somehow a "revolutionary" are prone to defining things so broadly that they probably believe that a phallic symbol is anything that's longer than it is wide.
<snip>
And then there's his killing of Americans. After suffering that ass-whuppin' at Agua Prieta, Villa's men attacked a train near Santa Isabel, Chihuahua. They slaughtered 17 Americans, including 15 who worked for the American Smelting and Refining Company. (Villa admitted to having ordered the attack.) In 1916, Villa attacked the town of Columbus, New Mexico. Eighteen Americans died in the raid, which was carried out for no reason other than the fact that Villa was a pissy little bitch.
https://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/danehy/Content?oid=28168863
donkeypoofed
(2,187 posts)Ptah
(33,492 posts)https://www.library.pima.gov/content/pancho-villa-statue/
ProudMNDemocrat
(19,058 posts)Spent several nights in his village in the state of Zachatecas in 1912.
To Mexicans, Pancho Villa was their George Washington.
demosincebirth
(12,740 posts)marble falls
(62,063 posts)some obscure out of the way statue museum. And then I'd vote to let it stand.
In almost every single violent interaction between the US and Mexicans, the Mexicans got the worst of it.
There can be all sorts of arguments to be made over who and what Poncho Villa was. But the statue is a piece of art in a lot of ways. Its would even be better if the pedestal was removed and the statue mounted on a lawn.
There's a lot of life and movement in that piece.
Mussolini, bin Laden, Yamamoto, Goering? Really???????
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)Ptah
(33,492 posts)2naSalit
(92,701 posts)selective acknowledgement of the history of others is everything.
BusyBeingBest
(8,407 posts)that history, they are big into promoting stuff like Tombstone etc. That and many Arizonans come from elsewhere and probably have only heard the name (at most) and chalk it up to Wild West legend. There's a Pancho Villa state park in New Mexico, too. For me, the old border skirmishes and the Mexican American War are just interesting long-ago history, and not something I would get upset over, but yeah, I can see how it's a little traitorous in the light the author describes it.
brush
(57,511 posts)Last edited Thu Jul 9, 2020, 12:37 PM - Edit history (1)
to capture Villa. He failed and returned to this side of the border so it's sort of a wash between what Villa did on this side of the border and what Pershing did down there.
And btw, Villa was a very capable general who effectively used railroads for troop movements in leading his northern Mexican army. He worked in concert along with Madero, Orozco, Zapata and others to successfully overthrow dictator Diaz in the Mexican civil war.