Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

chouchou

(1,184 posts)
2. Personally, I think it's just corny. If I were in charge, I'd hire songwriters....
Mon Jul 29, 2024, 10:00 AM
Jul 29

...come up with several tunes and pick the best ones for the company.

OldBaldy1701E

(6,068 posts)
7. Which would cost around three to four times as much as it would to get the rights to use the tune.
Mon Jul 29, 2024, 12:02 PM
Jul 29

Then, there is the recognizing factor, as well as the current wave of nostalgia... oh yeah, this is far from a shocker.

Also, the library is owned by someone other than the Beatles. They make that decision. I am betting the current owners are not artists.

Now, I agree with you completely. But, around 50 or so years back the entertainment industry became the entertainment business.

Thanks to that, there is little more than greed in any 'artistic endeavor' these days. So, one can forget any loyalty to the art or the creator.

chouchou

(1,184 posts)
8. Amen. My best friend was/is in the entertainment industry.
Mon Jul 29, 2024, 01:06 PM
Jul 29

She does a lot on Zoom now (or something more secure)
Oh yeah..she has the entertainment business pat. Singers and such are corporate You-WILL-do-this.
The days of finding a wonderful talent (s) are WAY long gone.
What surprised me was there's only a few songwriters that write all the major songs. No wonder they sound like copies.
Her take is "Dumb down the populace....make it easy-peasy to exploit them". Screw that Classical complicated crap"
BUT..I'm sure you know even more than what I wrote. (I don't talk much about this topic to people)
I don't even balk when somebody says "OH!! (insert big star here)....she wrote a new song!!...Yeah...sure....

Haggard Celine

(16,987 posts)
5. I took an uber a couple of times recently,
Mon Jul 29, 2024, 10:19 AM
Jul 29

and the drivers had regulars who they took to the store once a week to get medicine and groceries. Probably most of these people are old and others are on disability. Maybe they are trying to appeal to the older customers.

Xavier Breath

(4,760 posts)
4. I would have thought the Beatles song you were talking about
Mon Jul 29, 2024, 10:11 AM
Jul 29

was Drive My Car, though I realize that is not what happens when you use an Uber.

Brace yourself: Life in the Fast Lane should be the next commercial.

unblock

(53,991 posts)
6. At least it's not "don't pass me by", which mentions a car crash
Mon Jul 29, 2024, 11:44 AM
Jul 29

Could be worse.

Teen angel?
Dead man's curve?
Wreck on the highway?
Stan?
I love it?

rsdsharp

(9,986 posts)
9. Sony ATV apparently owns the Beatles catalog, but it entered into a confidential settlement with McCartney in 2017,
Mon Jul 29, 2024, 06:09 PM
Jul 29

so who knows. The commercial, however, actually appears to be the Beatles recording of the song. The rights to Beatles recordings are owned by Apple Corps Ltd. and Vivendi Universal Music Group. SOMEBODY had to give permission to use the song and recording in the commercial.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»TV Chat»Does it bother anyone els...