Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

SWBTATTReg

(24,085 posts)
1. I see it. Wow. Perhaps the plate wasn't 100% perfectly created (a flaw in manufacturing the plate), ...
Sun Sep 15, 2024, 03:31 PM
Sep 15

Very interesting!

Eko

(8,489 posts)
2. Guy prob had to leave.
Sun Sep 15, 2024, 03:32 PM
Sep 15

How long did it take to take a photo in the 1870s?
The exposure time for daguerreotypes was originally anywhere from five minutes to half an hour, making sitting for a portrait a painful and often unsuccessful process. Innovations in the 1840s increased the sensitivity of the photographic plates and reduced the exposure time to under a minute.

HeartsCanHope

(735 posts)
3. The guy just might have moved when the picture was taken.
Sun Sep 15, 2024, 04:22 PM
Sep 15

Also my son says it could be a double exposure. I don't think it's a ghost.

pansypoo53219

(21,721 posts)
5. long exposures. he was moving.
Sun Sep 15, 2024, 07:48 PM
Sep 15

the only oldest pic of a human because he was getting his shoes shined.no shiner.

Clouds Passing

(2,267 posts)
4. Looks like a ghost. I had a ghost in my house, she was always messing with
Sun Sep 15, 2024, 05:38 PM
Sep 15

lights, fans, radios, rattling windows and doors. Hiding things.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»A ghost?