Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 06:34 PM Sep 2015

The TPP Will Finish What Chile’s Dictatorship Started

 Salvador Allende warned against neoliberalism’s disastrous effects just before he was overthrown. He was right to be worried.



Neoliberalism is hard to define. It could refer to intensified resource extraction, financialization, austerity, or something more ephemeral, a way of life, in which collective ideals of citizenship give way to marketized individualism and consumerism.

But Allende offered a pretty good definition back in 1972, in a speech to the United Nations given less than a year before his overthrow and death. He said: “We are faced by a direct confrontation between the large transnational corporations and the states. The corporations are interfering in the fundamental political, economic and military decisions of the states. The corporations are global organizations that do not depend on any state and whose activities are not controlled by, nor are they accountable to any parliament or any other institution representative of the collective interest. In short, all the world political structure is being undermined.”

Like rust, neoliberalism never sleeps. The global rentier class that enriches itself off the neoliberal property-rights regime had, a decade ago, hoped to lock down Latin America under the hemisphere-wide Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA). In its original version, the FTAA was meant to be a special carve-out for Washington and Wall Street, as global “free trade” advanced under the umbrella of the Doha round of the WTO. Kind of an economic Monroe Doctrine, whereby the United States could maintain its regional hegemony over Latin America while still promoting, when it suited, globalization. But that scheme fell apart with the return of Latin America’s post–“Washington consensus” left, led at the time by Brazil, Venezuela, and Argentina. And the Doha round stalled.

 So Washington came back with the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a 12-country treaty—including Chile, Peru, and Mexico—vigorously promoted by the Obama administration. It’s been described nicely by Lori Wallach as NAFTA on steroids. As others have pointed out, the TPP isn’t really about trade. Rather, it’s a supra-national regulatory straitjacket that institutionalizes Allende’s 1972 warning. Among other things, the TPP has the effect of hiving off Brazil and Argentina from Latin America’s Pacific Rim countries. South America’s governing left is weakened and defensive, and the vitality with which Lula, Chávez, and Kirchner pushed back on any number of US initiatives—war on Iraq, trade, intellectual property, and so on—is dissipated. In Brazil, Dilma has recently capitulated on a number of issues she had long resisted, including surveillance and the adoption of Patriot Act–like “anti-terror” legislation (not to mention her recent visit to NYC to genuflect before Henry Kissinger). The divide-and-rule TPP would, by creating a divergent set of economic interests among neighboring countries, further limit the possibility of political solidarity against economic and security policies pushed by Washington (as this pro-TPP op-ed implies).

 The TPP includes one provision that will, if activated, complete the 1973 coup against Allende: its Investor-State Dispute Settlement mechanism. ISDS allows corporations and investors to “sue governments directly before tribunals of three private sector lawyers operating under World Bank and UN rules to demand taxpayer compensation for any domestic law that investors believe will diminish their ‘expected future profits.’”

...
full piece: http://www.thenation.com/article/the-tpp-will-finish-what-chiles-dictatorship-started/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

enough

(13,449 posts)
1. Interesting article by Greg Grandin. His book The Empire of Necessity, is one of the most
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 06:39 PM
Sep 2015

useful I've read in a long time.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
2. Why are countries under the TPP allowing corporations to sue them at all?????
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 07:05 PM
Sep 2015

They don't allow unions, conservation groups, citizen organizations or political groups to sue them. Why are corporations treated so special?

Just like those extra secret courts the people are never told about, now the uber rich have their own private little court system to extract more fees and penalties with. And all at the expense of taxpayers.

What a scam


Hydra

(14,459 posts)
3. The biggests of scams
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 07:56 PM
Sep 2015

Ironically, as usual, the RW has it entirely backwards. They fear a strong UN- they should be fearing a strong coalition of Megacorps taking over the world instead.

A world without borders and laws, a world of profits and exploitation.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
4. it's not "Reaganomics," its Pinonomics that Reagan happened to adopt
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 09:24 PM
Sep 2015

the bankers flew off with Chile's money, too (Venezuela's, too)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»The TPP Will Finish What ...