Socialist Progressives
Related: About this forumClinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department
This discussion thread was locked by TBF (a host of the Socialist Progressives group).
By David Sirota @davidsirota d.sirota@ibtimes.com
Andrew Perez @AndrewPerezDC andrew.perez@ibtimes.com on May 26 2015 8:44 AM EDT
Under Clinton's leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation, according to an IBTimes analysis of State Department and foundation data. That figure -- derived from the three full fiscal years of Clintons term as Secretary of State (from October 2010 to September 2012) -- represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to the those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bushs second term.
The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation, resulting in a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. These extra sales were part of a broad increase in American military exports that accompanied Obamas arrival in the White House. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period.
American defense contractors also donated to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state and in some cases made personal payments to Bill Clinton for speaking engagements. Such firms and their subsidiaries were listed as contractors in $163 billion worth of Pentagon-negotiated deals that were authorized by the Clinton State Department between 2009 and 2012.
In all, governments and corporations involved in the arms deals approved by Clintons State Department have delivered between $54 million and $141 million to the Clinton Foundation as well as hundreds of thousands of dollars in payments to the Clinton family, according to foundation and State Department records. The Clinton Foundation publishes only a rough range of individual contributors donations, making a more precise accounting impossible.
Under federal law, foreign governments seeking State Department clearance to buy American-made arms are barred from making campaign contributions -- a prohibition aimed at preventing foreign interests from using cash to influence national security policy. But nothing prevents them from contributing to a philanthropic foundation controlled by policymakers.
Questions about the nexus of arms sales and Clinton Foundation donors stem from the State Departments role in reviewing the export of American-made weapons. The agency is charged with both licensing direct commercial sales by U.S. defense contractors to foreign governments and also approving Pentagon-brokered sales to those governments. Those powers are enshrined in a federal law that specifically designates the secretary of state as responsible for the continuous supervision and general direction of sales of arms, military hardware and services to foreign countries. In that role, Hillary Clinton was empowered to approve or reject deals for a broad range of reasons, from national security considerations to human rights concerns.
More at the link:
http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187
I wonder if there were emails on Hillary's server about any of this.
johnp3907
(3,890 posts)Response to johnp3907 (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
TBF
(34,318 posts)but I do like him. Or at least prefer him over the other choices. At any rate, Starry is correct that we don't want to get in trouble with copyright. Other than that I think this is old news ... I really don't know that folks in this forum want to talk about Hillary and her e-mails. I think we'd prefer to look at her past votes, trends in what she values in terms of economic policy etc ...
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)Can you please edit to shorten this? I did get an SOP alert on this, but I think it is fine for discussion in here, unless other hosts disagree with me. The primaries are going to be a topic.
But the length is way over the limits the Admins prefer. Thanks in advance.
TBF
(34,318 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)I am on break and won't be back until later, but hopefully the OP will see the message.
candelista
(1,986 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)TBF
(34,318 posts)one of the other hosts can unlock if they feel strongly about re-opening the discussion. The OP has been PPR'ed (no clue why - this post was not hidden so it must've been something else).
At any rate, it's an article from a few months ago and I'm not sure it's anything we want to discuss in this group anyway.