Socialist Progressives
Related: About this forumSeventy-five years since the assassination of Leon Trotsky
[font color=330099]Note: While this article is not completely in line with the SOP of this group, I am posting it for historical context about one of the lead figures on socialism. If the hosts of this forum want the article deleted, then I will oblige; however, I will be in a medical appointment throughout the morning and possibly early afternoon.[/font]
Seventy-five years ago today, on August 20, 1940, Leon Trotsky, co-leader of the Russian Revolution and founder of the Fourth International, was assaulted with an ice pick by Stalinist agent Ramón Mercader. The attack took place at Trotskys villa in Coyoacán, Mexico, his final place of exile. The great revolutionary died the next day from his wounds, at the age of 60.
The murder of Trotsky came at the high point of international political reaction that included the victory of fascism in Germany in 1933, the defeat of the Spanish Revolution of 1936-39, the Moscow Trials and Great Terror of 1936-38, and the outbreak of the Second World War in September 1939. The assassination of Trotsky was the response of the Stalinist bureaucracywhich, as Trotsky explained, was a political agency of imperialismto the danger posed by the Marxist principles for which he fought. As long as Trotsky lived, Stalin would have to contend with his most implacable opponent.
Against incredible odds, however, Trotsky had managed to form the Fourth International, which has outlived the assassins who struck him down. Seventy-five years later, Trotskys unique position in the history of international socialism is indisputable. He emerges ever more clearly as a world historical figure who not only influenced the course of the 20th century, but whose writings and ideas remain an essential guide for orienting the working class as it enters a new period of revolutionary struggle.
Trotskys life and fate were inextricably tied to the great events of the first half of the 20th century. Trotsky and Lenin were the principal leaders of the Russian Revolution, the pinnacle of an enormous upsurge of international working-class struggle against the depredations of capitalism and the horrific slaughter of the First World War. The political theory of the revolution itself was provided by Trotskys Theory of Permanent Revolution, forged in the midst of the 1905 Russian Revolution, which explained that the democratic tasks in underdeveloped countries such as Russia could be completed only by the working class taking power as part of a world socialist revolution.
Read more: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/08/20/pers-a20.html
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)rivera. frida had an affair with trotsky.
http://www.historytoday.com/richard-cavendish/trotsky-offered-asylum-mexico
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... who ultimately was trying to shoot down the likes of Democratic Socialists like Trotsky then.
And today we have that Koch family aligning with 1%er forces here to shut down Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)TBF
(34,320 posts)but I'd love to hear more about it. I wouldn't be surprised to see the long-ago business connections.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)father or grandfather (I'm not sure which) was hired by Stalin to develop the oil industry in the USSR and I do believe that was one of the big reasons that the family wound up so very wealthy. I'm just going on the memory of some articles I've read over the last few years, so I haven't researched it thoroughly, but I'm pretty sure that's accurate.
However your characterization of Trotsky as a Democratic Socialist is pretty far off the mark. Trotsky was a revolutionary to his core and to his dying day. He didn't believe that you could "elect" socialism and keep capitalism in place. Just like Lenin he believed that you had to seize state power in a revolution and expropriate the wealth and power that had been taken from workers by the bourgeoisie pretty much by any means necessary.
TBF
(34,320 posts)we have many followers of Trotsky here.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)I don't think there's a problem talking about Trotsky, Lenin or even Stalin here. Or even arguing about their various methods of party organization. What we DON'T want here is name-calling because someone follows a different method than somebody else. We can disagree without the invective.