Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rotegard

(29 posts)
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 07:15 PM Dec 2015

Planned Parenthood has been Defamed! Sue those responsible for libel ! !

"Between 1992 and August 2004, 41 criminal defamation cases were brought to court in the United States, among which six defendants were convicted. From 1965 to 2004, 16 cases ended in final conviction, among which nine resulted in jail sentences (average sentence, 173 days). Other criminal cases resulted in fines (average fine, $1,700), probation (average of 547 days), community service (on average 120 hours), or writing a letter of apology." Wikipedia

When someone spreads damaging lies about an important charity(501C-3) like Planned Parenthood they should expect significant push back through the courts. Friends of women's rights need to hit the producers and distributors of that "baby parts" video into court and clean their clock!


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Planned Parenthood has been Defamed! Sue those responsible for libel ! ! (Original Post) Rotegard Dec 2015 OP
I totally agree. The time is way overdue to go on the offensive. LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #1
Just for Reference Rotegard Dec 2015 #2
When they sue... rpritchard93 Jan 2016 #3

Rotegard

(29 posts)
2. Just for Reference
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 08:57 PM
Dec 2015

2015 Minnesota Statutes

609.765 CRIMINAL DEFAMATION.
Subdivision 1.Definition. Defamatory matter is anything which exposes a person or a group, class or association to hatred, contempt, ridicule, degradation or disgrace in society, or injury to business or occupation.
Subd. 2.Acts constituting. Whoever with knowledge of its defamatory character orally, in writing or by any other means, communicates any defamatory matter to a third person without the consent of the person defamed is guilty of criminal defamation and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.
§Subd. 3.Justification. Violation of subdivision 2 is justified if:
(1) the defamatory matter is true and is communicated with good motives and for justifiable ends; or
(2) the communication is absolutely privileged; or
(3) the communication consists of fair comment made in good faith with respect to persons participating in matters of public concern; or
(4) the communication consists of a fair and true report or a fair summary of any judicial, legislative or other public or official proceedings; or
(5) the communication is between persons each having an interest or duty with respect to the subject matter of the communication and is made with intent to further such interest or duty.
Subd. 4.Testimony required. No person shall be convicted on the basis of an oral communication of defamatory matter except upon the testimony of at least two other persons that they heard and understood the oral statement as defamatory or upon a plea of guilty.
History: 1963 c 753 art 1 s 609.765; 1984 c 628 art 3 s 11; 1986 c 444

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Propaganda Debunking»Planned Parenthood has be...