Propaganda Debunking
Related: About this forumWashington Refines Its False Flag Operations
Washington Refines Its False Flag Operations Paul Craig Roberts
November 16, 2015
Washington Refines Its False Flag Operations
Paul Craig Roberts
Washington and its French vassal have refined how they conduct their false flag operations. With the Charlie Hebdo operation, they knew to immediately set the story in stone in order to avoid any questions from the print and TV media and in order to use the set story to take the place of an investigation.
The set story made it unnecessary to explain the mysterious suicide of one of the main police investigators while engaged in the investigation of the event. The set story also made it unnecessary to explain why it was necessary to kill rather than capture the alleged perpetrators, or to explain how the French authorities could be so wrong about the alleged get-away-driver but not about the two gunmen. There has been no explanation why the authorities believed there was a get-away-driver, and no such driver has been captured or killed. Indeed, there are many unanswered questions of no interest to any media except the alternative Internet media.
What the US and France learned from the Charlie Hebdo skepticism on the Internet is to keep the story flowing. Charlie Hebdo involved two scenes of violence, and the connection between the two acts of terrorism was vague. This time there were several scenes of violence, and they were better connected in the story.
More importantly, the story was followed quickly by more drama, such as the pursuit of a suspected perpetrator into Belgium, a French bombing attack on the Islamic State, a French aircraft carrier sent to the Middle East, a declaration of war by the French President against ISIL, and speculation that Hollande, pressured by Washington, will invoke NATOs Article V, which will pull NATO into an invasion of the Islamic State. By superceding each event with a new one, the publics attention is shifted away from the attack itself and the interests served by the attack. Already the attack itself is old news. The publics attention has been led elsewhere. How soon will NATO have boots on the ground?
The Western media has avoided many interesting aspects of the Paris attacks. For example, what did the directors of the CIA and French intelligence discuss at their meeting a few days prior to the Paris attacks. Why were fake passports used to identify attackers? Why did the attacks occur on the same day as a multi-site simulation of a terrorist attack involving first responders, police, emergency services and medical personnel? Why has there been no media investigation of the report that French police were blinded by a sophisticated cyber attack on their mobile data tracking system? Does anyone really believe that ISIL has such capability?
More:
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/11/16/washington-refines-its-false-flag-operations-paul-craig-roberts/
katsy
(4,246 posts)Daesh claimed responsibility.
What about that little fact confuses pcr?
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)involving first responders, police, emergency services and medical personnel?"
If this is true then this can of worms is ripped wide open, because this exact "anomaly" occurred with 9/11 in New York, the Madrid train bombing, and the London bombing.
COLGATE4
(14,840 posts)Laffy Kat
(16,517 posts)I had to stop talking to an old friend when she jumped on the conspiracy bandwagon: Columbine, 9/11, Aurora movie theater, Sandy Hook, they were all staged according to her. The one that caused me to stop emailing/talking to her was the Holocaust; she actually said she thought it was way overblown, that the ovens were there to burn the clothes and kill the lice. There's nothing you can do. Logic doesn't work. It's sad.
Historic NY
(37,810 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I just really hope it's not true.