Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(162,350 posts)
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:29 PM Nov 2015

Washington Refines Its False Flag Operations

Washington Refines Its False Flag Operations — Paul Craig Roberts

November 16, 2015

Washington Refines Its False Flag Operations

Paul Craig Roberts

Washington and its French vassal have refined how they conduct their false flag operations. With the Charlie Hebdo operation, they knew to immediately set the story in stone in order to avoid any questions from the print and TV media and in order to use the set story to take the place of an investigation.

The set story made it unnecessary to explain the mysterious “suicide” of one of the main police investigators while engaged in the investigation of the event. The set story also made it unnecessary to explain why it was necessary to kill rather than capture the alleged perpetrators, or to explain how the French authorities could be so wrong about the alleged get-away-driver but not about the two gunmen. There has been no explanation why the authorities believed there was a get-away-driver, and no such driver has been captured or killed. Indeed, there are many unanswered questions of no interest to any media except the alternative Internet media.

What the US and France learned from the Charlie Hebdo skepticism on the Internet is to keep the story flowing. Charlie Hebdo involved two scenes of violence, and the connection between the two acts of terrorism was vague. This time there were several scenes of violence, and they were better connected in the story.

More importantly, the story was followed quickly by more drama, such as the pursuit of a suspected perpetrator into Belgium, a French bombing attack on the Islamic State, a French aircraft carrier sent to the Middle East, a declaration of war by the French President against ISIL, and speculation that Hollande, pressured by Washington, will invoke NATO’s Article V, which will pull NATO into an invasion of the Islamic State. By superceding each event with a new one, the public’s attention is shifted away from the attack itself and the interests served by the attack. Already the attack itself is old news. The public’s attention has been led elsewhere. How soon will NATO have boots on the ground?

The Western media has avoided many interesting aspects of the Paris attacks. For example, what did the directors of the CIA and French intelligence discuss at their meeting a few days prior to the Paris attacks. Why were fake passports used to identify attackers? Why did the attacks occur on the same day as a multi-site simulation of a terrorist attack involving first responders, police, emergency services and medical personnel? Why has there been no media investigation of the report that French police were blinded by a sophisticated cyber attack on their mobile data tracking system? Does anyone really believe that ISIL has such capability?

More:
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/11/16/washington-refines-its-false-flag-operations-paul-craig-roberts/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Washington Refines Its False Flag Operations (Original Post) Judi Lynn Nov 2015 OP
This is some seriously fucked up fiction katsy Nov 2015 #1
"Why did the attacks occur on the same day as a multi-site simulation of a terrorist attack GoneFishin Nov 2015 #2
Some serious links required. COLGATE4 Nov 2015 #3
You can't reason with conspiracy theorists. Laffy Kat Nov 2015 #4
Yup.... Historic NY Nov 2015 #5
unfortunately it did come to mind almost immediately 2pooped2pop Nov 2015 #6

katsy

(4,246 posts)
1. This is some seriously fucked up fiction
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:46 PM
Nov 2015

Daesh claimed responsibility.

What about that little fact confuses pcr?

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
2. "Why did the attacks occur on the same day as a multi-site simulation of a terrorist attack
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:50 PM
Nov 2015

involving first responders, police, emergency services and medical personnel?"

If this is true then this can of worms is ripped wide open, because this exact "anomaly" occurred with 9/11 in New York, the Madrid train bombing, and the London bombing.

Laffy Kat

(16,517 posts)
4. You can't reason with conspiracy theorists.
Tue Nov 17, 2015, 12:15 AM
Nov 2015

I had to stop talking to an old friend when she jumped on the conspiracy bandwagon: Columbine, 9/11, Aurora movie theater, Sandy Hook, they were all staged according to her. The one that caused me to stop emailing/talking to her was the Holocaust; she actually said she thought it was way overblown, that the ovens were there to burn the clothes and kill the lice. There's nothing you can do. Logic doesn't work. It's sad.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Propaganda Debunking»Washington Refines Its Fa...