Propaganda Debunking
Related: About this forumRW BS: "The case against Hillary Clinton", anyone want to take a crack at dismantling this ?
http://interactive.nydailynews.com/2016/11/op-ed-case-against-hillary-clinton/BEFORE YOU ATTACK ME, note this is in PROPAGANDA DEBUNKING. Thank you.
emulatorloo
(45,551 posts)Doubt DU'ers are going to waste their time giving a point by point rebuttal.
This is not gonna sway anybody.
It is porn for Trump's base to jerk off to.
. Clinton voters/left leaning independents know it is just more Murdoch bullshit.
Snopes might put up sometime.
As to DU'ers Time better spent making calls and knocking doors for HRC, IMHO
Historic NY
(37,810 posts)emulatorloo
(45,551 posts)I see it is a point-counterpoint series of editorials.
I stand behind everything else I wrote except the Murdoch part.
Especially since doing a little googling about the author, LISA SCHIFFREN
As you say in your post below, longtime Republican hack.
procon
(15,805 posts)This isn't a news article, its just someone's personal opinion. Evidently its a counter argument as part of a series featuring an earlier anti-Trump letter, and now this is the rebuttal.
That Op-Ed is below. Read both and come to your own conclusions.
No worries.