Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumWhy no insurrection charge? Ralph Nader on how Trump could still be reelected unless DOJ acts
Let's not shoot the messenger. He makes some very good points.
Aristus
(72,188 posts)You're one of the reasons we've sunk this low, buddy-boy. Stick to consumer advocacy. You were brilliant at that.
WhiteTara
(31,260 posts)he is the reason we can't have nice things. He did what he did and the world is paying. May he receive all his just rewards in hell.
Fullduplexxx
(8,626 posts)MagaSmash
(12,361 posts)That might just be what Smith's working on.
He's proven he knows how to stay a step ahead of El Cheetolino.
marble falls
(71,940 posts)peppertree
(23,344 posts)He makes some very good points.
Now - Smith might still be working on that insurrection charge, as a superseding indictment.
But if that's going to be left off the table...
samsingh
(18,426 posts)The Unmitigated Gall
(4,710 posts)jrthin
(5,225 posts)republianmushroom
(22,326 posts)31 months and counting
peppertree
(23,344 posts)But you're right: the fact that it's taken this long speaks to the fact that big-money interests were in favor of the coup attempt - and were only sorry it failed.
In other countries, when coup attempts are swept under the rug - that's almost always the reason.
In Argentina, for example, a fascist group financed by a family closely-tied to Trump's pal Macri (the Caputos), came this close to assassinating the country's popular (but polarizing) vice president a year ago.
Link to tweet
Elections are this year, and at the time it was widely believed she'd run - and probably win (she opted out).
The case - overseen by a right-wing federal judge and prosecutor - is being systematically swept under the rug.
The reason? The local gentry does not want it investigated - and were only sorry it failed.
History likes to rhyme.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,872 posts)I will never forgive nader Rove funded Nader in 2000 and 2004 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/ralph-nader-was-indispens_b_4235065.html
Furthermore, Karl Rove and the Republican Party knew this, and so they nurtured and crucially assisted Naders campaigns, both in 2000 and in 2004. On 27 October 2000, the APs Laura Meckler headlined GOP Group To Air Pro-Nader TV Ads. She opened: Hoping to boost Ralph Nader in states where he is threatening to hurt Al Gore, a Republican group is launching TV ads featuring Nader attacking the vice president [Mr. Gore]. ... Al Gore is suffering from election year delusion if he thinks his record on the environment is anything to be proud of, Nader says [in the commercial]. An announcer interjects: Whats Al Gores real record? Nader says: Eight years of principles betrayed and promises broken. Mecklers report continued: A spokeswoman for the Green Party nominee said that his campaign had no control over what other organizations do with Naders speeches. Bushs people - the group sponsoring this particular ad happened to be the Republican Leadership Council - knew exactly what they were doing, even though the liberal suckers who voted so carelessly for Ralph Nader obviously did not. Anyone who drives a car the way those liberal fools voted, faces charges of criminal negligence, at the very least. But this time, the entire nation crashed as a result; not merely a single car.....
On July 9th, the San Francisco Chronicle headlined GOP Doners Funding Nader: Bush Supporters Give Independents Bid a Financial Lift, and reported that the Nader campaign has received a recent windfall of contributions from deep-pocketed Republicans with a history of big contributions to the party, according to an analysis of federal records. Perhaps these contributors were Ambassador Egans other friends. Mr. Egans wife was now listed among the Nader contributors. Another listed was Nijad Fares, a Houston businessman, who donated $200,000 to the Bush inaugural committee and who donated $2,000 each to the Nader effort and the Bush campaign this year. Furthermore, Ari Berman reported 7 October 2004 at the Nation, under Swift Boat Veterans for Nader, that some major right-wing funders of a Republican smear campaign against Senator John Kerrys Vietnam service contributed also $13,500 to the Nader campaign, and that the Republican Party of Michigan gathered ninety percent of Naders signatures in their state (90%!) to place Nader on the ballot so Bush could win that swing states 17 electoral votes. Clearly, the word had gone out to Bushs big contributors: Help Ralphie boy! In fact, on 15 September 2005, John DiStaso of the Manchester Union-Leader, reported that, A year ago, as the Presidential general election campaign raged in battleground state New Hampshire, consumer advocate Ralph Nader found his way onto the ballot, with the help of veteran Republican strategist David Carney and the Carney-owned Norway Hill Associates consulting firm.
It was obvious, based upon the 2000 election results, that a dollar contributed to Nader in the 2004 contest would probably be a more effective way to achieve a Bush win against Kerry in the U.S. Presidential election than were perhaps even ten dollars contributed to Bush. This was a way of peeling crucial votes off from Bushs real opponent - votes that otherwise would have gone to the Democrat. Thats why the smartest Republican money in the 2004 Presidential election was actually going to Nader, even more so than to Bush himself: these indirect Bush contributions provided by far the biggest bang for the right-wing buck.